Publication:
Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Trauma

dc.authorscopusid8279592300
dc.authorscopusid8279591800
dc.authorscopusid7005996515
dc.authorscopusid8279592000
dc.authorscopusid6603429684
dc.authorscopusid8279592200
dc.contributor.authorNural, M.S.
dc.contributor.authorYardan, T.
dc.contributor.authorGüven, H.
dc.contributor.authorBaydin, A.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, I.K.
dc.contributor.authorKati, C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:23:39Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:23:39Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Nural] Mehmet Selim, Department of Radiodiagnostics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yardan] Türker, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Güven] Hakan, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Baydin] Ahmet, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bayrak] Ilkay Koray, Department of Radiodiagnostics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kati] Celal, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography (US) in detecting intraabdominal injuries in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Materials and methods: Blunt trauma patients admitted to the emergency department from January 2002 to August 2003 were retrospectively evaluated. A total of 454 patients with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent US examination were included. Ultrasonography results were compared with findings of CT, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, laparotomy and clinical course. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of US in detecting free fluid, intraabdominal parenchymal organ injury or both were calculated. Results: Computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage and laparotomy results showed that intraabdominal organ injury was present in 37 of 454 patients. Ultrasonography examinations were positive in 51 patients. True-positive findings were seen in 32 of these patients. In these 32 patients, US examination showed free fluid in 19, fluid and abdominal organ injury in 11 and only abdominal organ injury in 2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of US in detecting intraabdominal injury were 86.5%, 95.4%, 62.7%, 98.7% and 94.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasonography has high diagnostic performance in the screening of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Abdominal US is a useful and valuable diagnostic tool after clinical evaluation in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Because of its high negative predictive value, we recommend that clinical follow up is adequate for patients whose US results are negative for intraabdomial organ injury. © Turkish Society of Radiology 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage44en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.issn1305-3612
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15795843
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-16244367106
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage41en_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostic and Interventional Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.journalDiagnostic and Interventional Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectWounds, Non-Penetratingen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic Value of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Traumaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files