Publication:
Effect of Operator Variability on Microleakage with Different Adhesive Systems

dc.authorscopusid26021842100
dc.authorscopusid6506357068
dc.authorscopusid55236843600
dc.authorscopusid6603476898
dc.authorscopusid6602869118
dc.authorscopusid6602574901
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, E.
dc.contributor.authorYazici, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, B.
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, E.
dc.contributor.authorÖzgünaltay, G.
dc.contributor.authorDayangaç, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:38:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:38:12Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Karaman] Emel, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yazici] Ayse Rüya, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Aksoy] Burak, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Karabulut] Erdem, Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Özgünaltay] Gül, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Dayangaç] Berrin, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 standardized Class V cavities were prepared on facial and lingual of 90 extracted human premolar teeth and randomly assigned to five groups according to the adhesive systems used (n = 36): Prime and Bond NT (PB), Single Bond (SB), Futura Bond NR, Xeno III (XE) and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (LP). The adhesive groups were then further subdivided into three operator groups according to level of clinical experience (n = 12): An undergraduate student, a research assistant and a faculty member. All cavities were restored with same composite resin. The restored teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5-55°C) then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin and measured for leakage under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Significant inter-operator variation was found in the enamel margins in the XE group with significantly higher microleakage when used by the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences in microleakage were found between adhesive systems for the research assistant and faculty member (P > 0.05), significant differences were observed between PB and LP, PB and XE, SB and LP and SB and XE in the enamel margins for the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Microleakage of adhesive systems is more dependent on interactions between the operator and adhesive material than on the choice of adhesive material. © 2013 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.119075
dc.identifier.endpageS65en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.issn1305-7464
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84893667799
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpageS60en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119075
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDentin Bondingen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectOperator Variabilityen_US
dc.titleEffect of Operator Variability on Microleakage with Different Adhesive Systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files