Publication:
The Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Implant Insertion with Cone Beam Computed Tomography

dc.authorscopusid12244598400
dc.authorscopusid57021276600
dc.authorscopusid56183515500
dc.authorscopusid56183465900
dc.authorscopusid55909449700
dc.authorscopusid23988464900
dc.contributor.authorSumer, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorÇalışkan, A.
dc.contributor.authorUzun, C.
dc.contributor.authorKaroz, T.B.
dc.contributor.authorSümer, M.
dc.contributor.authorÇankaya, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:39:17Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:39:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sumer] Ayse Pinar, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çalışkan] Armağan, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Uzun] Canan, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Karoz] T. Berre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sümer] Mahmut, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çankaya] Soner, Department of Biostatistics, Ordu Üniversitesi, Ordu, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe palate is an alternative anchoring site for orthodontic implants and screws. The use of osseointegrated implants in the intermaxillary suture has recently been described as a fast, effective, and low-cost technique for patients with atrophy of the maxillae. The aim of this study was to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the thickness of the bone surrounding the intermaxillary suture in relation to the insertion of osseointegrated implants. CBCT images of 144 patients (72 males, 72 females) aged 35–86 years were evaluated. The vertical bone height of the intermaxillary suture was measured using coronal and sagittal Images 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm posterior to the incisive foramen. The mean bone thicknesses from the anterior to the posterior region were 5.59, 4.38, 3.91, 3.95, and 3.94 mm, respectively. Bone thickness was significantly different among the five anteroposterior areas of the suture, but there were no significant differences between males and females, or among age groups. The highest part of the intermaxillary suture was in the anterior region. Three-dimensional imaging is recommended to accurately identify palate bone thickness for implant placement. © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeonsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.012
dc.identifier.endpage220en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26458537
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84951768529
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage216en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13521
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000369464300015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.subjectPalatal Implantsen_US
dc.subjectPalateen_US
dc.titleThe Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Implant Insertion with Cone Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files