Publication:
Essential Oil Composition and Variability of Hypericum perforatum from Wild Populations of Northern Turkey

dc.authorscopusid10144652000
dc.authorscopusid7005055114
dc.authorscopusid35218240100
dc.authorscopusid12039791300
dc.contributor.authorÇirak, C.
dc.contributor.authorBertoli, A.
dc.contributor.authorPistelli, L.
dc.contributor.authorSeyis, F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:47:33Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:47:33Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Çirak] Çüneyt, Vocational High School of Bafra, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bertoli] Alessandra, Department of Bioorganic Chemistry and Biopharmaceutics, Università di Pisa, Pisa, PI, Italy; [Pistelli] Luisa F., Department of Bioorganic Chemistry and Biopharmaceutics, Università di Pisa, Pisa, PI, Italy; [Seyis] Fatih, Department of Agronomy, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractContext: Hypericum perforatum L. (Guttiferae) contains many bioactive secondary metabolites including hypericins, hyperforins, and essential oil. Objective: The present study was conducted to determine the variation in composition of essential oil in H. perforatum accessions from Turkey. Material and methods: At full flowering, aerial parts of 30 plants were collected from 10 sites of northern Turkey and assayed for essential oil components by GC-FID and GC-MS. Results: The chemical analysis revealed that the main constituents of the all analyzed samples were hydrocarbon and oxygenated sesquiterpenes such as β-caryophyllene (4.08-5.93%), γ-muurolene (5.00-9.56%), β-selinene (5.08-19.63%), α-selinene (4.1210.42%), d-cadinene (3.024.94%), spathulenol (2.3-45.14%), and caryophyllene oxide (6.01-12.18%). Monoterpenes, both hydrocarbon and oxygenated, were represented by scarce amounts of α- and β-pinene, myrcene, linalool, cis- and trans-linalool oxide, and α-terpineol. Principal component analysis was also carried out and, according to the results, the first nine principal components were found to represent 100% of the observed variation. Discussion: The chemical variation among the populations is discussed as the possible result of different genetic and environmental factors. Conclusions: The wild populations examined here are potentially important sources for breeding and improvement of the cultivated varieties. © 2010 Informa UK Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/13880200903311136
dc.identifier.endpage914en_US
dc.identifier.issn1388-0209
dc.identifier.issn1744-5116
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20673178
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955196030
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage906en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/13880200903311136
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000281304800010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofPharmaceutical Biologyen_US
dc.relation.journalPharmaceutical Biologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEssential Oilen_US
dc.subjectGC-MSen_US
dc.subjectHypericum Perforatumen_US
dc.subjectPCAen_US
dc.subjectSesquiterpenesen_US
dc.subjectWild Populationsen_US
dc.titleEssential Oil Composition and Variability of Hypericum perforatum from Wild Populations of Northern Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files