Publication:
Dimensional Changes in Free Gingival Grafts: Scalpel Versus Er:YAG Laser—A Preliminary Study

dc.authorscopusid55747754500
dc.authorscopusid55748117000
dc.authorscopusid7801652658
dc.authorscopusid6603291949
dc.contributor.authorTürer, Ç.C.
dc.contributor.authorIpek, H.
dc.contributor.authorKirtiloǧlu, T.
dc.contributor.authorAçikgöz, G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:50:59Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:50:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Türer] Çiǧdem Coşkun, Department of Periodontology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ipek] Hanifi, Department of Periodontology, Oral and Dental Health Center, Eskisehir, Turkey; [Kirtiloǧlu] Tuǧrul, Department of Periodontology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Açikgöz] Gökhan, Department of Periodontology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this clinical study was to compare dimensional changes of the transplanted grafts when the recipient area was prepared with either erbium:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser or scalpel in free gingival grafts (FGGs). In the first and second groups of ten patients, the recipient area was prepared with an Er:YAG laser and a scalpel, respectively. All grafts were harvested from the palate at standard dimensions (horizontal, 14 mm; vertical, 8 mm). Probing depth, clinical attachment level, and keratinized tissue width were measured before surgery. FGG dimensions (width, length, and area) were measured using the University of North Carolina-15 manual probe (N15) (Nordent Manufacturing, Inc., IL, USA) during surgery and at 10, 21, and 90 days postoperatively. Differences between the two groups were statistically analyzed. In both groups, there was a statistically significant reduction in vertical and horizontal dimensions (p < 0.05) and graft area (p < 0.05) at all time points compared to the baseline measurements. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to vertical and horizontal dimensions and graft area at day 90 (p > 0.05). The Er:YAG laser may be used with similar effectiveness as the scalpel in the preparation of the recipient site for free gingival grafts. © 2013, Springer-Verlag London.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-013-1349-7
dc.identifier.endpage548en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23728804
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84878226130
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage543en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1349-7
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349549500009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Londonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalLasers in Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG Laseren_US
dc.subjectFree Gingival Graften_US
dc.subjectGraft Dimensionen_US
dc.subjectShrinkageen_US
dc.titleDimensional Changes in Free Gingival Grafts: Scalpel Versus Er:YAG Laser—A Preliminary Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files