Publication:
Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonography in Temporomandibular Disorders

dc.authorscopusid20733782300
dc.authorscopusid47161712400
dc.authorscopusid47161156500
dc.authorscopusid7007082917
dc.contributor.authorBaş, B.
dc.contributor.authorYlmaz, N.
dc.contributor.authorGkce, E.
dc.contributor.authorAkan, H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:40:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:40:18Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Baş] Burcu, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ylmaz] Nergiz, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Gkce] Erkan, Department of Radiology, Samsun Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Diseases Hospital, Samsun, Samsun, Turkey; [Akan] Hüseyin, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of ultrasonographic imaging (USI) in temporomandibular disorders. Patients and Methods USI and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in 182 temporomandibular joints (TMJs) of 91 patients who were referred for treatment. After a detailed clinical examination, patients who were clinically diagnosed with TMJ disc derangement were referred to the radiology department for MRI and USI examinations. USI and MRI diagnoses of disc displacement were compared, using clinical diagnosis as the golden standard. The overall agreement between USI and MRI results was evaluated. Results Compared with the clinical diagnosis, MRI showed a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 62%, and an accuracy of 80% in the detection of internal derangements. The positive predictable value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio were 88%, 54%, and 2.29, respectively. Compared with the clinical diagnosis, USI showed a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 80%, and accuracy of 71% in the detection of internal derangements. The positive predictable value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio were 92%, 42%, and 3.45, respectively. Comparing the agreements between the MRI and USI diagnoses of internal derangement, the κ value was found to be 0.36, indicating poor reliability (P < .001). Conclusion USI, a noninvasive and dynamic imaging method, is a reliable method in evaluating the position of the disc in TMJ disc derangements. Better visualization of joint structures and more reliable results with higher sensitivity and accuracy can be achieved with high-resolution devices (<12 MHz). © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.012
dc.identifier.endpage1310en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21256654
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79954994399
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1304en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.012
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290242300020
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic Value of Ultrasonography in Temporomandibular Disordersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files