Publication:
Single Session Removal of Forgotten Encrusted Ureteral Stents: Combined Endourological Approach

dc.authorscopusid26633591500
dc.authorscopusid11240177700
dc.authorscopusid54419415500
dc.authorscopusid8967520200
dc.authorscopusid35577105100
dc.authorscopusid7003897524
dc.contributor.authorBostanci, Y.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, E.
dc.contributor.authorAtac, F.
dc.contributor.authorYakupoglu, Y.K.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, A.F.
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:17:43Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bostanci] Yakup, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özden] Ender, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Atac] Fatih, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yakupoglu] Yarkin Kamil, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yilmaz] Ali Faik, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sarikaya] Şaban, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractForgotten ureteral stents represent a difficult problem for urologists; the major complications are infection, migration, encrustation, stone formation, and multifractured stent, and a consensus on the best therapeutic approach is lacking. Here we present our experience with endoscopic management of this challenging problem and discuss the various endourological approaches for treating forgotten encrusted ureteral stents. From January 2005 to December 2010, 19 patients (11 women and 8 men) with encrusted ureteral stents were retrospectively analyzed. Combined endourologic therapies including extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL), and cystolithotripsy (CLT) were used to achieve stent removal. A total of 19 patients with encrusted ureteral stents were treated at our center. The mean patient age was 46.2 ± 18.5 years (8-81), the average indwelling time of the stent was 24.7 ± 19.0 months (8-93), and the mean hospital stay was 3.4 ± 4.0 days (range 1-15 days). Using the described combination of techniques, all stents and the associated stones were eventually removed without any complications and patients were rendered stone- and stentfree. A main element of the treatment strategy was to keep the number of interventions as low as possible. The use of various combinations of endourological techniques can achieve effective stent and stone treatment after a single anesthesia session with minimal morbidity and short hospital stay. © Springer-Verlag 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-011-0442-2
dc.identifier.endpage529en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5623
dc.identifier.issn1434-0879
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22160282
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84867896799
dc.identifier.startpage523en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0442-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16323
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308813800011
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrological Researchen_US
dc.relation.journalUrological Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEncrustationen_US
dc.subjectEndourological Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectForgotten Ureteral Stenten_US
dc.subjectIndwelling Timeen_US
dc.titleSingle Session Removal of Forgotten Encrusted Ureteral Stents: Combined Endourological Approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files