Publication:
Comparison of Different Toothbrushing Protocols in Poor-Toothbrushing Orthodontic Patients

dc.authorscopusid12783629100
dc.authorscopusid57213273171
dc.authorscopusid6508173204
dc.contributor.authorArici, S.
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, A.
dc.contributor.authorArici, N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:18:45Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Arici] Selim, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Alkan] Banu Arzu, Department of Periodontology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Arici] Nursel,en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine, using a computerized image analysing system, whether the use of a curved-bristle toothbrush (CBT) alone is more effective than two other toothbrushing protocols on dental plaque elimination in poor-toothbrushing orthodontic patients. The labial surfaces of the maxillary canine-to-canine anterior teeth of 30 patients (12 males and 18 females) were individually photographed following dental plaque staining before and 4 weeks after each toothbrushing protocol, with a 1-month washout interval. The toothbrushes used were (1) a CBT, (2) an orthodontic toothbrush (OT), and (3) an OT in combination with interproximal toothbrush (IT) (OT+IT). Total labial surfaces of the anterior teeth and stained plaque areas were measured and gingival indices (GIs) were also recorded.Repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference multiple range tests showed that the OT+IT produced a statistically significant decrease in the mean plaque percentage both for the total labial (7.2%) and interproximal (17.7%) tooth surfaces, when compared with the other toothbrushing protocols (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the CBT and OT for the amount of bacterial plaque and GI scores (P>0.05).Neither the CBT nor the OT alone was able to remove plaque under the archwires in poor-toothbrushing patients. Therefore, the use of ITs should be mandatory for effective plaque removal in these patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjm038
dc.identifier.endpage492en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17974538
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-35948982544
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage488en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm038
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000250676900012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Different Toothbrushing Protocols in Poor-Toothbrushing Orthodontic Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files