Publication:
Evaluation of Complications in Urgent Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Single-Center Experience

dc.authorscopusid57217679526
dc.authorscopusid14026128800
dc.authorscopusid6602658770
dc.authorscopusid7003848073
dc.authorscopusid55911844200
dc.contributor.authorBalkoca, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTurkmen, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorDilek, Melda
dc.contributor.authorArik, Nurol
dc.contributor.authorSayarlioglu, Hayriye
dc.contributor.authorIDTurkmen, Ercan/0000-0001-5445-4735
dc.contributor.authorIDBalkoca, Murat/0000-0001-7893-9972
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:14:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Balkoca, Murat] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Internal Med, Samsun, Turkey; [Turkmen, Ercan; Dilek, Melda; Arik, Nurol; Sayarlioglu, Hayriye] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Nephrol, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionTurkmen, Ercan/0000-0001-5445-4735; Balkoca, Murat/0000-0001-7893-9972en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Patients who were urgent start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) were evaluated in terms of complications. Methods The data from 102 patients (43 males and 59 females, mean age 58.18 +/- 15.3 years) who were on peritoneal dialysis with a placed catheter between January 2014 and June 2019 in our Nephrology clinic was evaluated. The patients were divided into three groups according to the starting time of peritoneal dialysis. The development of complications between the groups (peritonitis, leakage, hernia), hemodialysis return time and overall survival times were compared. Results There was no difference between the groups in terms of survival and complications. Diabetes, advanced age, albumin values were found to be risk factors for mortality, while no differences were found between the groups in terms of complications and mortality. Conclusion USPD can be recommended for both because it provides a permanent dialysis option and because it leads to fewer complications than urgent start HD.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1744-9987.13916
dc.identifier.endpage319en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744-9979
dc.identifier.issn1744-9987
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36127867
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138347578
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.13916
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42269
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000855700800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTherapeutic Apheresis and Dialysisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChronic Kidney Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectPeritoneal Dialysisen_US
dc.subjectUrgent Start Peritoneal Dialysisen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Complications in Urgent Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Single-Center Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files