Publication:
Effects of Fixed Functional Appliance Treatment on the Temporomandibular Joint

dc.authorscopusid12783629100
dc.authorscopusid7007082917
dc.authorscopusid24336864600
dc.authorscopusid6508173204
dc.contributor.authorArici, S.
dc.contributor.authorAkan, H.
dc.contributor.authorYakubov, K.
dc.contributor.authorArici, N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:13:37Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:13:37Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Arici] Selim, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Akan] Hüseyin, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yakubov] Kamran, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Arici] Nursel,en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In this study, we tested the hypothesis that fixed functional appliance treatment in a group of Class II Division 1 patients with mandibular retrusion changes the condyle position in the glenoid fossa. Methods: Transverse computed tomography images were taken of the temporomandibular joint region in 60 children with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Thirty randomly selected patients were treated with a fixed functional orthodontic appliance (Forsus nitinol flat-spring, 3M Unitek Corp, Monrovia, Calif) for 7 months; another 30 patients without treatment were used as controls. Computed tomography images taken at the beginning and end of fixed functional appliance treatment were used for estimating the condyle-glenoid fossa relationship, including the volumes of condyle, glenoid fossa, and anterior and posterior joint spaces. Results: Although the volumes of the condyle and glenoid fossa increased more in the study group than in the control group, the differences were not statistically significant. However, statistically significant differences were found between the groups in the volumes of the anterior and posterior joint spaces (P < 0.05). Conclusions: When the volumes of the anterior and posterior joint spaces changed, the condyle was more posteriorly positioned in the glenoid fossa in the study group than in the control group. © 2008 American Association of Orthodontists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.035
dc.identifier.endpage814en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18538243
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-44449112636
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage809en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.035
dc.identifier.volume133en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000256449300021
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEffects of Fixed Functional Appliance Treatment on the Temporomandibular Jointen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files