Publication:
Comparative Study of Turbulent Flow Around a Bluff Body by Using Two- and Three-Dimensional CFD

dc.authorscopusid57196506372
dc.authorscopusid57191406398
dc.authorscopusid6506464375
dc.authorscopusid35613419200
dc.contributor.authorOzdogan, M.
dc.contributor.authorSungur, B.
dc.contributor.authorNamli, L.
dc.contributor.authorDurmuş, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:17:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ozdogan] Muhammet, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sungur] Bilal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Namli] Lutfu,; [Durmuş] Aydın, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the turbulent flow around a bluff body for different wind velocities was investigated numerically by using its two- and three-dimensional models. These models were tested to verify the validity of the simulation by being compared with experimental results which were taken from the literature. Variations of non-dimensional velocities in different positions according to the bluff body height were analysed and illustrated graphically. When the velocity distributions were examined, it was seen that the results of both two- and three-dimensional models agree with the experimental data. It was also seen that the velocities obtained from two-dimensional model matched up with the experimental data from the ground to the top of the bluff body. Particularly, compared to the front part of the bluff body, results of the upper and back part of the bluff body are better. Moreover, after comparing the results from calculations by using different models with experimental data, the effect of multidimensional models on the obtained results have been analysed for different inlet velocities. The calculation results from the two-dimensional (2D) model are in satisfactory agreement with the calculation results of the three-dimensional model (3D) for various flow situations when comparing with the experimental data from the literature even though the 3D model gives better solutions. © © 2017 Techno-Press, Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/was.2017.25.6.537
dc.identifier.endpage549en_US
dc.identifier.issn1226-6116
dc.identifier.issn1598-6225
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85040006455
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage537en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.25.6.537
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000418418900002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTechno Press technop2@chollian.neten_US
dc.relation.ispartofWind and Structuresen_US
dc.relation.journalWind and Structuresen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBluff Bodyen_US
dc.subjectComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)en_US
dc.subjectRNG k-ε Modelen_US
dc.subjectThree-Dimensional Modelen_US
dc.subjectTurbulence Modelingen_US
dc.subjectTurbulent Flowen_US
dc.subjectTwo-en_US
dc.subjectWind Flowen_US
dc.titleComparative Study of Turbulent Flow Around a Bluff Body by Using Two- and Three-Dimensional CFDen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files