Publication:
Comparison of Mechanical Design and Flow Analysis of Quadruped Robots

dc.contributor.authorTepe, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Enes
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:47:14Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-tempOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, there has been a trend of developing innovative technologies inspired by living creatures in nature. Quadruped robots, in particular, have emerged as walking mobile systems with articulated leg structures that can skilfully perform dynamic movements that wheeled systems are limited to. These robots offer advantages in technical criteria such as manoeuvrability, cross-capability, controllability, terrain adaptability and stability. It is important to note that this evaluation is based on objective technical criteria rather than subjective opinions. This study compares the advantages and disadvantages of quadruped robots to wheeled systems. It highlights that quadruped robots outperform wheeled systems in manoeuvrability, obstacle overcoming, and speed, particularly in rough terrains. The study also suggests that designers of quadruped robots should consider aerodynamic factors, which are often overlooked. Flow analysis using the finite element method is crucial in robot design to enhance aerodynamic performance. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse the flow structure around quadruped robots using Computational Fluid Dynamics and investigate passive flow control methods to reduce the drag coefficient (Cd). The study examines four different robots, and the resulting Cd average percentage calculations are presented. The aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 4 compared to Robot 2 was found to be 95%. Similarly, the aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 3 was determined to be 28% compared to Robot 2. Additionally, it was determined that the aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 2 was 76% compared to Robot 1. These results provide an important comparison to understand the energy efficiency, differences in aerodynamic performance and relative effectiveness of quadruped robots.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46519/ij3dptdi.1437626
dc.identifier.endpage172en_US
dc.identifier.issn2602-3350
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage162en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1259878
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1437626
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1259878/comparison-of-mechanical-design-and-flow-analysis-of-quadruped-robots
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/46222
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDenizciliken_US
dc.subjectGörüntüleme Bilimi ve Fotoğraf Teknolojisien_US
dc.subjectRobotiken_US
dc.subjectMeteoroloji ve Atmosferik Bilimleren_US
dc.titleComparison of Mechanical Design and Flow Analysis of Quadruped Robotsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files