Publication:
Evaluation of Survival of 3 Different Fixed Space Maintainers

dc.authorscopusid14049332200
dc.authorscopusid35730744800
dc.authorscopusid26041093200
dc.authorscopusid24172371100
dc.authorscopusid15759747100
dc.contributor.authorŞen Tunç, E.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, S.
dc.contributor.authorTüloğlu, N.
dc.contributor.authorEǧilmez, T.
dc.contributor.authorIsci, D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:36:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:36:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şen Tunç] Emine, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bayrak] Şule, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tüloğlu] Nuray, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Eǧilmez] Türkan, , Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Isci] Devrim, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a comparative evaluation of the survival times and failure rates of different types of fixed space maintainers (SMs). Methods: A total of 30 4- to 10-year-olds were selected for the study. Children were divided into 3 groups, according to type of SM, namely: band and loop (B&L), direct bonded (DB), and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC). Patients were recalled once every 3 months for clinical evaluation for 1 year or until failure. The survival times of SMs were estimated by means of the Kaplan-Meier method, and confounding factors were investigated using Cox regression analysis. Results: Mean survival time was highest for B&L SMs (11.20 months), followed by DB SMs (9.20 months) and FRC SMs (6.70 months). There were statistically significant differences noted between types of SMs (log rank=11.99; P=.002). The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that age, sex, dental arch, and side of the jaw were not significantly correlated with "success of SMs" (P < 05). Conclusions: Band and loop fixed space maintainers showed superior performance in terms of both survival time and success rates versus direct bonded and fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers.en_US
dc.identifier.endpagee102en_US
dc.identifier.issn0164-1263
dc.identifier.issn1942-5473
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23014081
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84865226476
dc.identifier.startpagee97en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPediatric Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.journalPediatric Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCh Ildrenen_US
dc.subjectFiber-Reinforced Compositeen_US
dc.subjectSpace Maintainersen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Survival of 3 Different Fixed Space Maintainersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files