Publication:
Relationship of Mandibular and Cervical Vertebral Bone Density Using Computed Tomography

dc.authorscopusid23090431500
dc.authorscopusid6602246734
dc.contributor.authorÇelenk, C.
dc.contributor.authorÇelenk, P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:17:59Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:17:59Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Çelenk] Çetin, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çelenk] Peruze, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to compare mandibular and cervical vertebral bone density (BD) using CT. Methods: Cervical CT images from 114 patients (46 women, 68 men; mean age 49 years) with various clinical symptoms (e.g. headache, vertigo and imbalance) were included in this study. The mandibular and cervical vertebral BD measurements, expressed in Hounsfield units, were performed by the same investigator on these sections. Results: The relationship between cervical vertebral and mandibular BD was revealed by regression and with correlation analysis. The correlation coefficient was r = 0.269, r2 = 0.07, P = 0.004, which is statistically significant because of the high number of patients. However, the r2 was very small, indicating that the power of the relationship is low. The distribution diagrams of the cervical vertebrae and mandible BD between female and male patients were similar. The relationship between age and mandibular BD was very weak (r = 0.033, r2 = 0.009, P = 0.726); the relationship between age and cervical vertebrae BD was also negatively correlated (r = -0.354, r 2 = 0.13, P = 0.0001). This finding indicates that there is a statistical significance, but that the strength of the relationship is weak (r2 = 0.13). Conclusions: There was a correlation between skeletal and mandibular BD, but the strength of the relationship is low. Mandibular BD for both men and women did not correlate with age; cervical vertebral BD did correlate with age. © 2008 The British Institute of Radiology.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr/90511049
dc.identifier.endpage51en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18195255
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-38949120474
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/90511049
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000252677000008
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.journalDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone Densityen_US
dc.subjectCervical Vertebraeen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectMandibleen_US
dc.titleRelationship of Mandibular and Cervical Vertebral Bone Density Using Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files