Publication:
Production Traits of Artificially and Naturally Hatched Geese in Intensive and Free-Range Systems: I. Growth Traits

dc.authorscopusid56524306600
dc.authorscopusid6602684340
dc.authorscopusid24765796700
dc.contributor.authorBoz, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorSarica, M.
dc.contributor.authorYamak, Umut Sami
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:26:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:26:30Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Boz] Mehmet Akif, Department of Animal Science, Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat, Turkey; [Sarica] Musa, Department of Animal Science, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yamak] Umut Sami, Department of Animal Science, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstract1. This study investigated the effect of incubation type and production system on geese growth traits. 2. A total of 216 geese were either naturally (114) or artificially (102) hatched and reared in intensive or free-range production systems (4 replicates each) until 18 weeks of age. 3. Weights of naturally hatched goslings (NHG) were significantly higher than artificially hatched goslings (AHG) at 2 weeks (644 vs. 536 g); however, weights of AHG were significantly higher than NHG at both 6 weeks (3245 vs. 3010 g) and 18 weeks (5212 vs. 4353 g). 4. AHG had better feed conversion ratios (FCRs) than NHG (6.21 vs. 6.46 at 18 weeks). Feed consumption of naturally hatched geese was found higher in first 4 weeks when compared to artificially hatched geese and artificially hatched geese consumed more feed than naturally hatched geese after 8 weeks. 5. Production system had insignificant effects on feed consumption, FCRs, viability and mutilation rates. 6. Slipped wings were more frequent in NHG than AHG (8.32% vs. 1.68% at 6 weeks; 23.84% vs. 5.12% between 7 and 18 weeks) and in free-range production when compared to intensive production (17.88% vs. 11.08% over the course of the production period). 7. The study results indicate that both artificially and NHG can be reared in free-range production systems without any loss in performance and in deference to animal welfare. © 2017 British Poultry Science Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00071668.2016.1261997
dc.identifier.endpage138en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1668
dc.identifier.issn1466-1799
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27911094
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009966249
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1261997
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000398206300004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd. michael.wagreich@univie.ac.aten_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Poultry Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalBritish Poultry Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGrowth Traitsen_US
dc.subjectIncubation Typeen_US
dc.subjectIntensive and Free-Range Productionen_US
dc.subjectSlipped Wingsen_US
dc.subjectWelfareen_US
dc.titleProduction Traits of Artificially and Naturally Hatched Geese in Intensive and Free-Range Systems: I. Growth Traitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files