Publication:
Effectiveness of an Antibacterial Primer Used with Adhesive-Coated Brackets on Enamel Demineralization Around Brackets: An in Vivo Study

dc.authorscopusid55048420600
dc.authorscopusid56569339300
dc.authorscopusid57197763101
dc.authorscopusid57208279871
dc.contributor.authorOz, Aslihan Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorOz, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorYazıcıoğlu, S.
dc.contributor.authorSancaktar, O.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:27:10Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Oz] Aslihan Zeynep, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Oz] Abdullah Alper, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yazıcıoğlu] Sabahat, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sancaktar] Ozlem, Dental Care Hospital, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of the study is to assess the clinical effect of an antibacterial monomer-containing primer on preventing white spot lesions (WSLs) during fixed orthodontic treatment. Subject and methods: The study included 35 patients. A split-mouth design was used during bonding of the brackets. In Clearfil (CF) group, adhesive-coated brackets (APC Plus Victory series, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were bonded with an antibacterial monomer-containing primer (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray Medical, Okayama, Japan). In Transbond (TB) group, the same adhesive-coated brackets were bonded using a conventional primer (Transbond XT Primer; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). The mean duration of orthodontic treatment was 16 months. Digital images of each tooth were used to assess the WSLs. The areas of the WSLs were measured with a software. The bond failures during orthodontic treatment were also recorded. Results: After fixed orthodontic treatment, 23 of the 35 patients showed one or more WSLs. Of the total of 666 teeth, 114 WSLs occurred over the orthodontic treatment time. Rates of WSL in the CF and TB groups were 8.03% and 9.24%, respectively. The difference in WSL rates between the two groups was not statistically significant. No significant difference was observed in the lesion areas between the groups. Moreover, the difference in bracket failure rates between the two groups was also not statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of this long-term clinical study indicated no significant difference between the antibacterial monomer-containing primer group and the control group in the efficacy of reducing demineralization throughout the orthodontic treatment. © 2019, The Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40510-019-0271-3
dc.identifier.issn1723-7785
dc.identifier.issn2196-1042
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30982931
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85064330665
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0271-3
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000464694100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalProgress in Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial Primeren_US
dc.subjectOral Hygieneen_US
dc.subjectWhite Spot Lesionsen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of an Antibacterial Primer Used with Adhesive-Coated Brackets on Enamel Demineralization Around Brackets: An in Vivo Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files