Publication:
Comparison of Communication Performance of Block Coding Methods in Different Channels Using DWT

dc.authorscopusid57188582201
dc.authorscopusid35791875600
dc.authorwosidYıldız, Doğan/Aai-5509-2020
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Dogan
dc.contributor.authorKaragol, Serap
dc.contributor.authorIDYildiz, Dogan/0000-0001-9670-4173
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yildiz, Dogan; Karagol, Serap] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Elect & Elect Engn, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionYildiz, Dogan/0000-0001-9670-4173en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the audio transmission performance of some block coding methods in wavelet and non-wavelet cases is compared. For this purpose, a communication system has been established in the MATLAB environment for the transmission of the audio signal for 5 s. The comparison of the transmission performance of the block codes was performed separately in different parameters of additive white Gaussian noise, Rician and Rayleigh channels. At the same time, it is determined which discrete wavelet transform (DWT) family is suitable in terms of transmission performance for block coding methods and how DWT level affects transmission performance is investigated. Four DWT families at different levels were applied to the audio signal for linear block coding, Hamming, Cyclic, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem, Reed-Solomon, encoded channels, and bit error rate and mean squared error performances were compared.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/iet-com.2019.1114
dc.identifier.endpage2006en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-8628
dc.identifier.issn1751-8636
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089336166
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.1114
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42008
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000553500700018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIET COMMUNICATIONSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBlock Codesen_US
dc.subjectRayleigh Channelsen_US
dc.subjectDiscrete Wavelet Transformsen_US
dc.subjectLinear Codesen_US
dc.subjectAWGN Channelsen_US
dc.subjectMean Square Error Methodsen_US
dc.subjectError Statisticsen_US
dc.subjectReed-Solomon Codesen_US
dc.subjectChannel Codingen_US
dc.subjectRician Channelsen_US
dc.subjectAudio Codingen_US
dc.subjectHamming Codesen_US
dc.subjectCyclic Codesen_US
dc.subjectAdditive White Gaussian Noiseen_US
dc.subjectRayleigh Channelsen_US
dc.subjectDWTen_US
dc.subjectMean Squared Error Performanceen_US
dc.subjectNonwavelet Casesen_US
dc.subjectCommunication Systemen_US
dc.subjectMATLAB Environmenten_US
dc.subjectAudio Signal Transmission Performanceen_US
dc.subjectLinear Block Coding Methodsen_US
dc.subjectRician Channelsen_US
dc.subjectDiscrete Wavelet Transformen_US
dc.subjectEncoded Channelsen_US
dc.subjectHamming Codeen_US
dc.subjectCyclic Codeen_US
dc.subjectReed-Solomon Codeen_US
dc.subjectBit Error Rateen_US
dc.subjectBose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem Codeen_US
dc.subjectTime 5en_US
dc.subject0 Sen_US
dc.titleComparison of Communication Performance of Block Coding Methods in Different Channels Using DWTen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files