Publication: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Hastanesine Getirilen Açık Yara Vakalarının Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi
Abstract
Bu çalışmada 2012-2020 yılları arasında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Eğitim-Uygulama ve Araştırma Hastanesi Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı'na getirilen açık yara vakalarının hasta kayıt formları incelenerek veriler retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi Değerlendirme yapılırken öncelikle hastaların eşkal bilgileri (tür, ırk, yaş, cinsiyet) etiyoloji, hastaların geldiği dönem, yaranın lokalizasyonu, yaranın açık veya kapalı olması, yara tipleri, uygulanan tedavi yöntemleri kriter olarak alındı. Vakalar inceleme kolaylığı açısından; abrazyon yarası, ateşli silah yaralanması, laserasyon yarası, fistül ve ısırık yarası olmak üzere beş farklı sınıfta değerlendirildi. 2012-2020 yılları arasında toplam (n=565) yaralanma vakası görüldü. Yaralanmalar ısırık yarası (n=196), abrazyon yarası (n=193), ateşli silah yaralanması (n=29), laserasyon yarası (n=78), fistül (n=44) olarak sınıflandırılarak grafiklerde gösterildi. Tedavi yöntemleri hakkında bilgiler verildi.
In this study, a retrospective evaluation of the data was made by examining the patient registration forms of open wound cases in animals brought to Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Veterinary Education-Practice and Research Hospital, Department of Surgery between in 2012-2020. During the evaluation, first of all, the patient's description information (type, race, age, gender), etiology, the period of admission, wound localization, open or closed wound,, wound types, and treatment methods were taken as criteria. In terms of ease of examination of the cases; It was evaluated in five different categories as abrasion wound, gunshot wound, laceration wound, fistula and bite wound. A total of (n=565) wounding cases were occurred between 2012 and 2020. Woundings were classified and shown in graphics as bite wound (n=196), abrasion wound (n=193), gunshot wound (n=52), laceration wound (n=78), fistula (n=44). Information about treatment methods was given.
In this study, a retrospective evaluation of the data was made by examining the patient registration forms of open wound cases in animals brought to Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Veterinary Education-Practice and Research Hospital, Department of Surgery between in 2012-2020. During the evaluation, first of all, the patient's description information (type, race, age, gender), etiology, the period of admission, wound localization, open or closed wound,, wound types, and treatment methods were taken as criteria. In terms of ease of examination of the cases; It was evaluated in five different categories as abrasion wound, gunshot wound, laceration wound, fistula and bite wound. A total of (n=565) wounding cases were occurred between 2012 and 2020. Woundings were classified and shown in graphics as bite wound (n=196), abrasion wound (n=193), gunshot wound (n=52), laceration wound (n=78), fistula (n=44). Information about treatment methods was given.
Description
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Source
Volume
Issue
Start Page
End Page
88