Publication:
Comparison of Stability Statistics for Yield in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

dc.authorscopusid15023234800
dc.authorscopusid21740442000
dc.authorscopusid36106476600
dc.contributor.authorMut, Z.
dc.contributor.authorGülümser, A.
dc.contributor.authorSirat, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:52:33Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:52:33Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Mut] Zeki, Department of Field Crops, Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat, Turkey; [Gülümser] Ali, Department of Field Crops, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sirat] Abdulveli, Department of Field Crops, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of multienvironment trials (METs) of crops for cultivar evaluation and recommendation is an important issue in plant breeding research. Evaluating both stability of performance and high yield is essential in MET analyses. The objectives of this study were to assess interrelationship among these measures and to identify high-yield and stable barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in 11 environments during 2001 - 2003 in the central Black Sea region of Turkey. Significant differences were observed among barley cultivars for grain yield, thousand-grain weight, hectoliter weight, plant height and heading date. In this study, high values of TOP (proportion of environments in which a genotype ranked in the top third) was associated with high mean yield, but the other methods were not positively correlated with mean yield and instead characterized a static concept of stability. The results of principal component (PC) analysis and correlation analysis of parametric and nonparametric stability statistics and yield indicated that only TOP method would be useful for simultaneously selecting for high yield and stability. This method recommended Fahrettinbey and Sladoran as stable and Balkan 96 and Erginel as unstable genotypes. A biplot of the first two PCs also revealed that the stability statistic methods grouped as three distinct classes that corresponded to different dynamic (agronomic) and static (biological) concepts of stability. © 2010 Academic Journals.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5897/ajb10.1404
dc.identifier.endpage1618en_US
dc.identifier.issn1684-5315
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77950647494
dc.identifier.startpage1610en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5897/ajb10.1404
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000276326400013
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Journal of Biotechnologyen_US
dc.relation.journalAfrican Journal of Biotechnologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBarleyen_US
dc.subjectDynamic and Static Stabilityen_US
dc.subjectGenotype × Environment Interactionen_US
dc.subjectParametric and Nonparametric Measuresen_US
dc.titleComparison of Stability Statistics for Yield in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files