Publication:
Suppression of Meloidogyne hapla Populations by Hirsutella minnesotensis

dc.authorscopusid9842225700
dc.authorscopusid7410251827
dc.authorscopusid6701462559
dc.contributor.authorMennan, S.
dc.contributor.authorChen, S.
dc.contributor.authorMelakeberhan, H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:29:29Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:29:29Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Mennan] Sevilhan, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Chen] Senyu, Southern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States; [Melakeberhan] Haddish, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United Statesen_US
dc.description.abstractThe effects of the endoparasitic fungus Hirsutella minnesotensis on populations of Meloidogyne hapla from Michigan (MI), Rhode Island (RI), Connecticut (CT), Lyndonville, New York (NYL), Geneva, New York (NYG), and Wisconsin (WI) were studied in the greenhouse. Twenty-day-old tomato (cv. Rutgers) seedlings were inoculated with either 0 or 600 eggs of each nematode population mixed with either 0, 0.02, or 0.1 g of fresh H. minnesotensis mycelium 0.1 L-1 of soil in pots containing 0.5 L of soil, and maintained at 25±2°C for 2 months. No effect of the fungal treatments and nematode treatments on tomato plant heights and shoot dry weights was observed. While all M. hapla populations were suppressed by H. minnesotensis, the degree to which each population was affected varied slightly. Across fungal treatments and nematode populations, the fungus reduced total number of nematodes in roots by 61-98%, with the highest for NYG and RI, intermediate for NYL and CT, and lowest for MI and WI populations. The study demonstrated that H. minnesotensis may be used as a potential suppressor of M. hapla in vegetable production systems in the Great Lakes Region. © 2006 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09583150500258610
dc.identifier.endpage193en_US
dc.identifier.issn0958-3157
dc.identifier.issn1360-0478
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-28844465748
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage181en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09583150500258610
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000233851700006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiocontrol Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.journalBiocontrol Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiological Control Agenten_US
dc.subjectHirsutella minnesotensisen_US
dc.subjectMeloidogyne haplaen_US
dc.subjectMethyl Bromide Alternativesen_US
dc.subjectNematophagous Fungusen_US
dc.subjectRoot-Knot Nematodeen_US
dc.titleSuppression of Meloidogyne hapla Populations by Hirsutella minnesotensisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files