Publication:
Assessment of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring and Sphygmomanometers in Patients with Hypertension

dc.authorscopusid35271904500
dc.authorscopusid59575343500
dc.authorscopusid35200033200
dc.authorscopusid55958508600
dc.authorscopusid57201201125
dc.authorscopusid6602658770
dc.authorscopusid6602658770
dc.contributor.authorErdem, E.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Cumali
dc.contributor.authorSari, A.
dc.contributor.authorÖzen, F.
dc.contributor.authorAslan, M.S.
dc.contributor.authorDilek, M.
dc.contributor.authorAkpolat, T.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T22:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Erdem] Emre, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kaya] Coşkun, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sari] Aysel, Karaman Devlet Hastanesi, Karaman, Turkey; [Özen] Feride, Kavak Devlet Hastanesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aslan] Melek Süzer, Bafra Devlet Hastanesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Dilek] Melda,; [Akpolat] Tekin, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractHome sphygmomanometers are becoming popular. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients' state of bringing their home blood pressure records to the clinic, the environment where the patients measure their blood pressure and the type of home devices. This study was performed in five different hospital internal medicine and nephrology outpatient clinics with 505 patients. Data was obtained with an appropriate questionnaire. 88 (17 %) of 505 patients brought their home blood pressure records. 266 (53%) of patients had home sphygmomanometers. Home devices were as follows: electronic wrist devices (46%), aneroid (25%), automated upper arm devices (19%) and mercury sphygmomanometers (7%). In patients having higher level of education, ownership of home devices and bringing of blood pressure monitoring records were more common. The highest rate of bringing blood pressure monitoring record was in the group of patients graduated from university when compared with the other groups (p<0.05). Patients graduated from secondary school, college and university were observed to have much more home devices than patients who were graduated from primary school and patients who didn't go to school (p<0.05). Although 53% of patients have home devices, only few patients brought home blood pressure measurement records. Electronic wrist devices were the most used instruments although guidelines didn't recommend.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage85en_US
dc.identifier.issn1306-8814
dc.identifier.issn1307-1173
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84864768097
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage81en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/35065
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnatolian Journal of Clinical Investigationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEducation Levelen_US
dc.subjectHome Blood Pressure Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectHypertensionen_US
dc.subjectSphygmomanometersen_US
dc.titleAssessment of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring and Sphygmomanometers in Patients with Hypertensionen_US
dc.title.alternativeHipertansiyon Hastalarına Ait Kan Basıncı Takipelerinin ve Tansiyon Aletlerinin Değerlendirilmesien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files