Publication:
Fluoride and Aluminum Release from Restorative Materials Using Ion Chromatography

dc.authorscopusid12799437600
dc.authorscopusid35730744800
dc.authorscopusid6603234977
dc.authorscopusid6507490625
dc.contributor.authorÖkte, Z.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, S.
dc.contributor.authorFidanci, U.R.
dc.contributor.authorSel, T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:28:58Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:28:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ökte] Zeynep, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Bayrak] Şule, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Fidanci] Ulvi Reha, Department of Biochemistry, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Sel] Tevhide, Department of Biochemistry, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to determine the amounts of fluoride and aluminum released from different restorative materials stored in artificial saliva and double-distilled water. Material and Methods: Cylindrical specimens (10 x 1 mm) were prepared from 4 different restorative materials (Kavitan Plus, Vitremer, Dyract Extra, and Surefil). For each material, 20 specimens were prepared, 10 of which were stored in 5 ml_ artificial saliva and 10 of which were stored in 5 ml_ of double-distilled water. Concentrations of fluoride and aluminum in the solutions were measured using ion chromatography. Measurements were taken daily for one week and then weekly for two additional weeks. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests (p<0.05). Results: The highest amounts of both fluoride and aluminum were released by the resin-modifed glass ionomer cement Vitremer in double-distilled water (p<0.05). All materials released significantly more fluoride in double-distilled water than in artificial saliva (p<0.05). In artificial saliva, none of the materials were observed to release aluminum. Conclusion: It was concluded that storage media and method of analysis should be taken into account when the fluoride and aluminum release from dental materials is assessed.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-77572012000100006
dc.identifier.endpage31en_US
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22437674
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84858791158
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage27en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000100006
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000302010800005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de Sao Pauloen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Applied Oral Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAluminumen_US
dc.subjectChromatographyen_US
dc.subjectFluoridesen_US
dc.titleFluoride and Aluminum Release from Restorative Materials Using Ion Chromatographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files