Publication:
Clinical Effect of a Fluoride-Releasing and Rechargeable Primer in Reducing White Spot Lesions During Orthodontic Treatment

dc.authorscopusid57212562867
dc.authorscopusid56569339300
dc.contributor.authorComert, S.
dc.contributor.authorOz, A.A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:19:10Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:19:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Comert] Secil, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Oz] Abdullah Alper, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study was performed to test the long-term efficacy of a highly filled resin primer (38%) that has superior fluoride release and recharge ability. Methods: Sixty patients were divided into 2 groups. In group 1, adhesive-coated brackets (APC Plus Victory series, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded with a fluoride-releasing and rechargeable primer (Opal Seal; Ultradent, South Jordan, Utah). In group 2, the same adhesive-coated brackets were bonded with a conventional primer (Transbond XT Primer; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). In group 1, a blacklight source was used to examine the amount of adhesive remaining on enamel surfaces. This primer has a fluorescing agent and fluoresces under blacklight. If there was a lack of primer on any part of the enamel surrounding the brackets, new primer was added. Digital images of each tooth were taken to score and measure the area of white spot lesions (WSLs) after orthodontic treatment. DIAGNOdent (DIAGNOdent pen; KaVo Dental, Biberach, Germany) measurements were also used to assess WSLs after bracket removal. Results: The WSL rate was 26.9% for group 1 and 29% for group 2. There was no significant difference between the WSL scores of the groups; however, a significant difference was observed in the DIAGNOdent measurements between the groups. According to area measurements of the lesions, there was no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: The results of this long-term clinical study indicated that fluoride-releasing primer has no significant advantage in reducing demineralization over the control primer over the full orthodontic treatment period. © 2019 American Association of Orthodontistsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.013
dc.identifier.endpage72en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31901283
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85077051646
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage67en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.013
dc.identifier.volume157en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000505220400013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby Inc. customerservice@mosby.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleClinical Effect of a Fluoride-Releasing and Rechargeable Primer in Reducing White Spot Lesions During Orthodontic Treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files