Publication:
Distance Education Practices During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Comparison of Belgium, Japan, Spain, and Türkiye

dc.authorwosidEminoğlu Küçüktepe, Seval/Aar-9180-2020
dc.authorwosidAkkan, İrem Nur/Hkw-4442-2023
dc.contributor.authorAkkan, Irem Nur
dc.contributor.authorKucuktepe, Seval Eminoglu
dc.contributor.authorIDEminoğlu Küçüktepe, Seval/0000-0003-0247-6654
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Akkan, Irem Nur] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Educ Sci, Curriculum & Instruct, Samsun, Turkiye; [Kucuktepe, Seval Eminoglu] Marmara Univ, Educ Sci, Curriculum & Instruct, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionEminoğlu Küçüktepe, Seval/0000-0003-0247-6654;en_US
dc.description.abstractDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many things changed in people's educational lives as individuals transitioned to remote learning. While technologically advanced countries swiftly adapted to the new normal, less developed countries encountered substantial obstacles. This study aimed to compare distance education practices during the lockdown in four OECD countries (Belgium, Japan, Spain, and T & uuml;rkiye) and provide future-oriented suggestions. A systematic literature review was conducted using OECD documents on distance education practices accessed through the OECD iLibrary database with a keyword search. Nine papers out of 1,294 meeting inclusion criteria were thoroughly reviewed, focusing on categories such as general information, sample practices, implementation challenges, conducting courses, supporting students during the lockdown, and evaluation and national examinations. A descriptive analysis was performed based on coding categories. Findings revealed that school closure durations varied by country and educational level, with each country adopting approaches suitable for distance learning. Online learning platform development was similar across countries, except for Japan, which has a distinct curriculum structure. Challenges, including technological limitations and resistance to change, were common, exacerbated by a lack of expertise and the need for rapid adaptation. Distance education primarily relied on computers, television, and homework, with radio use varying. Decisionmaking processes differed across countries, with centralized decision-making observed in T & uuml;rkiye. Supporting disadvantaged students and addressing learning losses were prioritized, and national exams were postponed with changes in content and the number of questions.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.endpage175en_US
dc.identifier.issn1492-3831
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage154en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/40770
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001344856400011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAthabasca University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learningen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCovid-19 Lockdownen_US
dc.subjectOecden_US
dc.subjectDistance Educationen_US
dc.subjectCountry Policyen_US
dc.titleDistance Education Practices During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Comparison of Belgium, Japan, Spain, and Türkiyeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files