Publication:
The Importance of Quality Planning Tools in Clinical Chemistry Laboratory; Kalite Planlama Araçlarının Klinik Kimya Laboratuvarındaki Önemi

dc.authorscopusid8639397400
dc.authorscopusid12752758300
dc.contributor.authorTomak, L.
dc.contributor.authorBek, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T22:59:55Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Tomak] Leman, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bek] Yüksel, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Quality planning in a laboratory can be defined as designing quality wanted or required for a test. The objective of a suitable choice is to determine the most efficient quality control rules and the number of control measurements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the features of the tools of quality planing while choosing quality control procedure. Methods: In this study, the tools of quality planing used to choose quality control procedure were operated for the data generated by simulation. These tools were created for both clinical decision interval and total analytical error model. EZ Rules 3.0 programme was used to obtain OPSpecs chart and critical error chart for both models. Results: In critical error chart, in clinical decision interval model, N=4, R=1 as control procedures, probability of detecting error is over 90% and probability of refusing wrong is less than 5%, in total analytical error model, probability of error detecting is almost 100%, probability of refusing wrong is less than 5%. Procedures applicable to total analytical error model and clinical decision interval model of OPSspecs model are N=4 and R=1. Conclusion: As a result, the number of control measurements required based on random and systematic error observed in the measurement procedure, and the above mentioned approaches, which facilite selecting control rules are important for quality control evaluations in clinical chemistry laboratories. In addition they are difficult to comment and to obtain without software. © TurkJBiochem.com.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/tjb.2015.80488
dc.identifier.endpage561en_US
dc.identifier.issn0250-4685
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922429730
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage554en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/tjb.2015.80488
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/35269
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkish Biochemistry Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Biochemistry-Turk Biyokimya Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory Proficiency Testingen_US
dc.subjectQuality Controlen_US
dc.subjectQuality Planning Toolsen_US
dc.titleThe Importance of Quality Planning Tools in Clinical Chemistry Laboratory; Kalite Planlama Araçlarının Klinik Kimya Laboratuvarındaki Önemien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files