Publication:
Comparison of Empirical Equations and Artificial Neural Network Results in Terms of Kinematic Viscosity Prediction of Fuels Based on Hazelnut Oil Methyl Ester

dc.authorscopusid22950351800
dc.authorscopusid8567184300
dc.authorscopusid56662071000
dc.authorscopusid55174904300
dc.contributor.authorEryılmaz, T.
dc.contributor.authorArslan, M.
dc.contributor.authorYeşilyurt, M.K.
dc.contributor.authorTaner, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:31:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Eryılmaz] Tanzer, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat, Turkey; [Arslan] Mevlüt, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat, Turkey; [Yeşilyurt] Murat Kadir, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat, Turkey; [Taner] Alper, Department of Agricultural Machinery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the prediction of kinematic viscosity values of hazelnut oil methyl ester (HOME) using empirical equations and artificial neural network (ANN) methods under varying temperature and blend ratio conditions with ultimate euro diesel (UED) fuel. Four different fuel blends (20, 40, 60, and 80% by volume mixing ratio) were studied along with UED fuel and pure biodiesel. Tests for kinematic viscosity were performed in the temperature range of 293.15–373.15 K at the intervals of 1 K for each fuel sample. Moreover, physicochemical properties of hazelnut crude oil (HCO), HOME and its blends, and also fatty acid composition of HCO and HOME were measured and discussed in light of ASTM and EN standards. Regression analyses were conducted using MATLAB software to determine the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and correlation constants. The best R2 and RMSE values were obtained by Eq. 6 as 0.9999 and 0.0068, respectively. In the analyses conducted using ANN, R2, and RMSE were obtained as 0.999986 and 0.00149 respectively based on the overall HOME–UED fuel blends. Although R2 values obtained by these two methods were close to each other, RMSE obtained using ANN was smaller than that of the one obtained by Eq. 6. In conclusion, the ANN method captures the best accuracy for the prediction of biodiesel kinematic viscosity with the highest R2 of 0.999986 and the lowest RMSE of 0.00149, which is within ±1% error range of the experimental data. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 35: 1827–1841, 2016. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Progen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ep.12410
dc.identifier.endpage1841en_US
dc.identifier.issn1944-7442
dc.identifier.issn1944-7450
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994910848
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1827en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12410
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13010
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000393419700035
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc. cs-journals@wiley.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Progress & Sustainable Energyen_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Progress & Sustainable Energyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networken_US
dc.subjectBiodieselen_US
dc.subjectFuel Propertyen_US
dc.subjectKinematic Viscosityen_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.titleComparison of Empirical Equations and Artificial Neural Network Results in Terms of Kinematic Viscosity Prediction of Fuels Based on Hazelnut Oil Methyl Esteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files