Publication:
Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study

dc.authorscopusid41861662400
dc.authorscopusid57959327700
dc.authorscopusid57190941048
dc.authorwosidÇelik, Ferdi/Hhm-7933-2022
dc.authorwosidJalilzadeh, Kaveh/Cah-4581-2022
dc.authorwosidDuran, Volkan/Aan-6759-2020
dc.contributor.authorJalilzadeh, Kaveh
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Ferdi
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Volkan
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:46:41Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Jalilzadeh, Kaveh] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Sch Foreign Languages, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Celik, Ferdi] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, English Language Educ, Samsun, Turkiye; [Duran, Volkan] Igdir Univ, Dept Dev Psychol, Igdir, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractResearch on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive-neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher-student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejed.70293
dc.identifier.issn0141-8211
dc.identifier.issn1465-3435
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105019307672
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70293
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/39138
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001618891300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Educationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAI-Mediated Higher Educationen_US
dc.subjectContent Analysisen_US
dc.subjectQ Methodologyen_US
dc.subjectSentiment Analysisen_US
dc.subjectStudent Perspectivesen_US
dc.subjectTeacher Interpersonal Behaviorsen_US
dc.titleStudent Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files