Publication:
Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Urinary Tract Dilatation in Children: Open Versus Endoscopic Surgery

dc.authorscopusid8854204800
dc.authorscopusid57199852323
dc.authorscopusid36648247400
dc.authorscopusid55245782400
dc.authorscopusid7003417540
dc.authorscopusid6701838215
dc.authorscopusid6701838215
dc.contributor.authorBiçakçi, U.
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, D.
dc.contributor.authorYağız, B.
dc.contributor.authorIssi, Y.
dc.contributor.authorGünaydin, M.
dc.contributor.authorTander, B.
dc.contributor.authorBernay, F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:42:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:42:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Biçakçi] Ünal, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Demirel] Berat Dilek, Pediatric Surgery, Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Samsun, Turkey; [Yağız] Beytullah, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Issi] Yaşar, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Günaydin] Mithat, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tander] Burak, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bernay] Ferit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractOur aim is to evaluate the efficiency and outcomes of endoscopic surgery (ES) and open surgery (OS) in children with urinary tract dilatation (UTD). Between February 2009 and June 2014, 77 patients (41 male, 36 female) with UTD underwent either an OS or ES. The age, gender, final diagnosis, type of surgery, postoperative problems (hematuria, fever, urinary tract infection and length of hospital stay (LOS) are retrospectively evaluated. The ES for UTD causes less pain, less hematuria, decreased LOS after surgery. ES is superior in terms of postoperative pain management, morbidity and LOS in selected conditions. © 2016 OMU.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5835/jecm.omu.33.01.007
dc.identifier.endpage26en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-4483
dc.identifier.issn1309-5129
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85046231685
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5835/jecm.omu.33.01.007
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOndokuz Mayis University Samsun 55139en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectOpen Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectUrinary Tract Dilatationen_US
dc.titleComparison of Treatment Modalities for Urinary Tract Dilatation in Children: Open Versus Endoscopic Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files