Publication:
Comparison of Biogas Upgrading Performances of Different Mixed Matrix Membranes

dc.authorscopusid7006498426
dc.authorscopusid55624903900
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, B.
dc.contributor.authorDemirciyeva, F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:05:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ozturk] Bahtiyar, Environmental Engineering Department, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Demirciyeva] Firuze, Environmental Engineering Department, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study composite membranes were manufactured by introducing zeolite 3A, 4A and 5A within polyimide (PI) and polyetherimide (PEI) in order to increase their separation performances for the gaseous mixture of CO<inf>2</inf> and CH<inf>4</inf> which are main components of the biogas. The effects of annealing temperatures, zeolite loadings, feed pressures and mixed gas and biogas feedings on the separation of CO<inf>2</inf>-CH<inf>4</inf> by membranes were investigated. It has also investigated that whether there is a relation between gas sorption capacity and separation performances of membranes manufactured. Membranes were characterised DSC, TGA and SEM analysis. The pure gas permeation and the mixed gas or biogas separation experiments indicated that the mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) prepared by introducing zeolite 4A into PI is a suitable candidate for CO<inf>2</inf>/CH<inf>4</inf> separation and/or methane enrichment from biogas. Zeolite loading into PEI increased the CO<inf>2</inf> and CH<inf>4</inf> permeabilities more than PI/zeolite-MMMs showed. But, the higher the zeolite loadings caused the lower the ideal CO<inf>2</inf>/CH<inf>4</inf> selectivities for PEI/zeolite-MMMs at all the feed pressures applied. The results also showed that there is a partial relation between gas permeability and sorption capacity of membranes used. The results of biogas separation experiments showed that the CO<inf>2</inf> content in the permeated gas increased as much as 95% at 3bar feed pressure. The highest CO<inf>2</inf> content in the permeated gas was obtained when PI/4A-MMM was used, and followed by PI/3A, pure PI, PI/5A, pure PEI, PEI/5A, PEI/4A and PEI/3A. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.062
dc.identifier.endpage217en_US
dc.identifier.issn1385-8947
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84875076996
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.062
dc.identifier.volume222en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319528900025
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science SAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofChemical Engineering Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalChemical Engineering Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiogasen_US
dc.subjectCO2-CH4 Separationen_US
dc.subjectGas Separationen_US
dc.subjectGas Sorptionen_US
dc.subjectMixed Matrix Membraneen_US
dc.titleComparison of Biogas Upgrading Performances of Different Mixed Matrix Membranesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files