Publication:
The Comparative Effects of Local Anaesthetics on Wound Healing in Rats: Bupivacaine vs Levobupivacaine

dc.authorscopusid36997869100
dc.authorscopusid8572127600
dc.authorscopusid35777271000
dc.authorscopusid24176563800
dc.authorscopusid6701523452
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, Y.O.
dc.contributor.authorUmuroǧlu, T.
dc.contributor.authorYaǧmur, C.
dc.contributor.authorGöǧüş, F.Y.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:42:28Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:42:28Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Atalay] Yunus O., Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Umuroǧlu] Tümay, Department of Anesthesiology, Marmara Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yaǧmur] Çaǧlayan, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Göǧüş] Fevzi Yilmaz, Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Hospital, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey; [Bozkurt] Süheyla Uyar, Department of Pathology, Marmara Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to investigate the effects of local anaesthetic agents (bupivacaine and levobupivacaine) on wound healing in rats. Wistar albino rats were randomly assigned to three groups (n=10 per group); the control group, the bupivacaine group, and the levobupivacaine group. An incision measuring 5 cm in length was made over the dorsum in all groups. The incisions were infiltrated with 3 ml of normal saline in the control group, 3 ml of 0.25%bupivacaine in the bupivacaine group, and 3 ml of 0.25%levobupivacaine in the levobupivacaine group. Histopathological examinations and tensile strength measurements were performed on tissue samples taken from the incision line 14 days after infiltration. Epidermal and dermal regeneration scores were significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine and control groups (p<0.05). Granulation tissue thickness, angiogenesis, and tensile strength measurements were not significantly different between groups. Even though incomplete epidermal and dermal regeneration scores were attained using levobupivacaine, both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine had no negative effects on the overall clinical wound-healing process. © 2016 OMU.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5835/jecm.omu.33.02.008
dc.identifier.endpage98en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-4483
dc.identifier.issn1309-5129
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019772170
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage93en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5835/jecm.omu.33.02.008
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOndokuz Mayis University Samsun 55139en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectInfiltration Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectLevobupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectLocal Anaestheticsen_US
dc.subjectWound Healingen_US
dc.titleThe Comparative Effects of Local Anaesthetics on Wound Healing in Rats: Bupivacaine vs Levobupivacaineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files