Publication:
Cyclic Fatigue of ProTaper Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Artificial Canals With 2 Different Radii of Curvature

dc.authorscopusid22934205900
dc.authorscopusid22933283900
dc.authorscopusid16317686700
dc.contributor.authorInan, U.
dc.contributor.authorAydin, C.
dc.contributor.authorTunca, Y.M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:18:24Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Inan] Uǧur, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aydin] Cumhur, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Tunca] Yaşar Meriç, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study compared the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files in artificial canals with 2 different radii of curvature. Study design: One hundred ProTaper rotary instruments were used in this study. Twenty files of each size (S1, S2, F1, F2, and F3) were tested. Cyclic fatigue testing was performed using a device that allowed the instruments to rotate freely inside stainless steel artificial canals with radii of curvature of 5 and 10 mm. The number of cycles to fracture was recorded for each file and the data were analyzed using a t-test. Results: The 5-mm radius group had significantly fewer cycles to fracture than the 10-mm radius group for all file sizes. For sizes F2 and F3, the difference between the 5 and 10-mm radius groups was highly significant (P < .001). For the 10-mm group, the difference between S1 and F3 was significant (P < .05). For the more abrupt 5-mm radius group, the difference between S1-F2, S2-F2, and F1-F2 was statistically significant. The difference between S1-F3, S2-F3, and F1-F3 was highly significant (P < .001). Conclusion: Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper instruments was dependent on both instrument size and radius of curvature. Especially larger-size instruments should be used with great care in curved canals. © 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.019
dc.identifier.endpage840en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17904394
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-36148956236
dc.identifier.startpage837en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.019
dc.identifier.volume104en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000251677300031
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleCyclic Fatigue of ProTaper Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Artificial Canals With 2 Different Radii of Curvatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files