Publication:
Does the Oropharyngeal Fat Tissue Influence the Oropharyngeal Airway in Snorers? Dynamic CT Study

dc.authorscopusid6506944100
dc.authorscopusid7007082917
dc.authorscopusid57205754340
dc.authorscopusid6508260156
dc.contributor.authorAksöz, T.
dc.contributor.authorAkan, H.
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, M.
dc.contributor.authorSakan, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:43:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:43:13Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Aksöz] Tolga, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Akan] Hüseyin, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çelebi] Mehmet, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey; [Sakan] Banu Baglan, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to determine if snorers have a narrower oropharyngeal airway area because of fat infiltration, and an elevated body mass index. Materials and Methods: Ten control subjects and 19 patients that snored were evaluated. We obtained 2-mm-thick axial CT scan images every 0.6 seconds during expiration and inspiration at the same level of the oropharynx. We selected the largest and the smallest oropharyngeal airway areas and found the differences. From the slice that had the smallest oropharyngeal airway area, the thickness of the parapharyngeal and subcutaneous fat was measured. The measurements from the left and right side were added together and single values for parapharyngeal and subcutaneous fat tissue thickness were then found. Results: The conventional measure of body mass index was significantly higher in the snorers (p < 0.05). The difference in the smallest oropharyngeal airway area between snorers and the controls was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The average difference between the largest and the smallest oropharyngeal area in the control group and the snorer group was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the largest oropharyngeal airway area, the total subcutaneous fat width and the total parapharyngeal fat width between snorers and control subjects (p > 0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that the oropharyngeal fat deposition in snorers is not an important factor, and it does not predispose a person to the upper airway narrowing.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/kjr.2004.5.2.102
dc.identifier.endpage106en_US
dc.identifier.issn1229-6929
dc.identifier.issn2005-8330
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15235234
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-3242690910
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage102en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.2.102
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000222492700004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Radiological Society office@radiology.or.kren_US
dc.relation.ispartofKorean Journal of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.journalKorean Journal of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomography (CT)en_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomography (CT), Functional Imagingen_US
dc.subjectNeck, Anatomyen_US
dc.subjectNeek, CTen_US
dc.titleDoes the Oropharyngeal Fat Tissue Influence the Oropharyngeal Airway in Snorers? Dynamic CT Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files