Publication:
Comparison of the Efficacies of Three Different Intrathecal Doses of Morphine in Achieving Postcesarean Delivery Analgesia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacies of 3 different intrathecal doses (80, 120, and 160 mcg) of morphine in achieving postcesarean delivery analgesia and the severity of the side effects thereof.Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.Methods: A total of 150 pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 40, with a gestational week >36, who were planned to have elective cesarean section were included in the study. Patients were randomized into 3 groups based on the dosages of intrathecal doses of morphine (80, 120, and 160 mcg) they will receive in addition to 10 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl. Intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) prepared with fentanyl was administered to each patient after the surgery. Postoperative 24hour total IV PCA-fentanyl consumption was recorded. The patients were evaluated for side effects such as pain, nausea-vomiting, pruritus, sedation score, and respiratory depression after the surgery.Findings: PCA-fentanyl consumption was significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and 3 (P = .047). There was no significant differences between the groups in terms of nausea-vomiting scores. The pruritus scores were significantly higher in Group 3 compared to Group 1 (P = .020). The pruritus scores were significantly higher in all groups at the postoperative 8th-hour (P = .013). Respiratory depression, which would require treatment, was not observed in any patient.Conclusions: Based on the study findings, it was concluded that 120 mcg intrathecal morphine provides adequate analgesia with minimal side effects in cesarean sections.(c) 2022 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Description

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q1

Source

Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing

Volume

38

Issue

5

Start Page

717

End Page

723

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By