Publication:
Influence of Different Implant-Abutment Connections on Stress Distribution in Single Tilted Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

dc.authorscopusid55976148200
dc.authorscopusid8678178400
dc.authorscopusid8856334100
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Ö.
dc.contributor.authorKülünk, T.
dc.contributor.authorKulunk, Ş.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:12:48Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:12:48Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Öztürk] Özgür, Estethica Surgical Medical Center, Alasehir, Istanbul, Turkey; [Külünk] Tolga, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kulunk] Safak, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. The load transfer between the implant-bone interface depends on various factors, including loading type; material properties of the implant and prosthesis; and implant geometry, length, diameter, and shape. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate stress distribution in single tilted bone-level implants with different connections and peripheral bone under vertical and oblique loads using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). METHOS. 3D models of four different implant systems and their abutments were created from the data (computer-aided design) of original implants and abutments scanned with an optical scanner. The implants were placed in the bone block at degrees of 0°, 15°, and 30°. Then, a 3D model of the metal-ceramic crown was created and a 100-N total load was applied vertically and obliquely. RESULTS. Stress analyses showed variable results depending on the connection design and tilting angle; however, the tube in tube (TIT) connection type exhibited lower stress values in most loading and tilting simulations. CONCLUSIONS. Increase in tilting angle showed variable results in each connection design. The TIT connection design was found to be more successful in terms of stress distributions in the implant components and the peripheral bone. © 2018 IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BME-181006
dc.identifier.endpage526en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-2989
dc.identifier.issn1878-3619
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30282347
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053927904
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage513en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BME-181006
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000445486200009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOS Press Nieuwe Hemweg 6B Amsterdam 1013 BGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBio-Medical Materials and Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalBio-Medical Materials and Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysisen_US
dc.subjectImplant-Abutment Connection Designen_US
dc.subjectImplant-Supported Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectStress Distributionen_US
dc.subjectTilted Implantsen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Different Implant-Abutment Connections on Stress Distribution in Single Tilted Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files