Publication:
Effect of Surface Treatments on Implant Crown Retention

dc.authorscopusid35092367100
dc.authorscopusid6506600649
dc.authorscopusid14120568100
dc.contributor.authorErgün Kunt, G.E.
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, G.
dc.contributor.authorTaşkaya-Yi̊lmaz, N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:47:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:47:13Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ergün Kunt] Göknil, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ceylan] Gözlem Koca, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Taşkaya-Yi̊lmaz] Nergiz, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: There are several surface treatment methods to improve the bond strength between dental materials. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of single crowns on Implant Direct abutments cemented with resin cement. Materials and methods: In total, 28 Screw Plant implants and abutments were divided into four study groups: I, control; II, sandblasted abutment and crown; III, non-sandblasted abutment and alloy primer applied to a sandblasted crown; and IV, alloy primer applied to a sandblasted abutment and crown. Twenty-eight crowns were cemented to abutments of implants, and a uniaxial tensile force was applied to the crowns using a universal test machine until cement failure occurred. Retention values were statistically analyzed. Results: All mean retention values significantly differed among groups. While the alloy primer applied to the sandblasted castings and abutments showed the highest mean value (564.73 ± 13.66 N), the control group showed the lowest mean value (357.65 ± 12.89 N). Sandblasting was not as effective as application of an alloy primer (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Sandblasting is an effective method to increase the bond strength. Sandblasting plus alloy primer application is a very effective method of increasing the bond strength, and these groups significantly differed from each other. © 2010 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60019-0
dc.identifier.endpage135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78049237807
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60019-0
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000282671700003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Dental Sciences of the Republic of Chinaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbutmenten_US
dc.subjectAlloy Primeren_US
dc.subjectImplant Supported Fixed Restorationen_US
dc.subjectRetentionen_US
dc.subjectSandblastingen_US
dc.titleEffect of Surface Treatments on Implant Crown Retentionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files