Publication:
Assessing the Effect of Soil to Water Ratios and Sampling Strategies on the Prediction of EC and pH Using pXRF and Vis-NIR Spectra

dc.authorscopusid57194573216
dc.authorscopusid35184805700
dc.authorscopusid16052385200
dc.authorscopusid57194112255
dc.authorwosidAltunbas, Sevda/C-8774-2016
dc.authorwosidDengiz, Orhan/Abg-7284-2020
dc.contributor.authorGozukara, Gafur
dc.contributor.authorAltunbas, Sevda
dc.contributor.authorDengiz, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorAdak, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gozukara, Gafur] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, TR-26160 Eskisehir, Turkey; [Altunbas, Sevda] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, TR-07059 Antalya, Turkey; [Dengiz, Orhan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, TR-55200 Samsun, Turkey; [Adak, Alper] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USAen_US
dc.description.abstractSoil electrical conductivity (EC) and pH play a critical role in managing agricultural productivity. We investi-gated the effect of soil to water ratios (1:1, 1:2.5, 1:5) and sampling strategies (surface, profile wall, and surface + profile wall) on prediction accuracy using individual and combined visible near infrared (Vis-NIR) and portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectra with machine learning algorithms for EC and pH. In total, 200 soil samples were collected from the soil surface (100 soil samples) and profile wall (100 soil samples) in pasture lands in Eskisehir, Turkiye. The soil samples were analyzed by considering soil to water ratios (1:1, 1:2.5, 1:5) for EC and pH and scanned by Vis-NIR (350-2500 nm) and pXRF (0-45 keV). In total 54 different predictor models were tested to achieve the highest prediction accuracy for both EC and pH. The seven machine learning re-gressions (elastic net, k-nearest neighbors, lasso, partial least squares, random forest, ridge, and support vector machine-linear) were applied in modeling with calibration (70 % soil samples) and validation (30 % soil sam-ples) datasets for each model. The results suggested that the EC1:2.5 and EC1:5 ratios had relatively higher pre-diction accuracy (r = 0.95, R2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.58, MAE = 0.46, RPD = 3.57, and RPIQ = 5.33) using Vis-NIR spectra with partial least squares and support vector machine-linear models in profile wall compared to other sampling strategies and EC1:1 ratio. The pH1:2.5 ratio had relatively higher prediction accuracy (r = 0.90, R2 = 0.81, RMSE = 0.07, MAE = 0.06, RPD = 2.49, and RPIQ = 3.71) using Vis-NIR spectra with random forest model in profile wall compared to other sampling strategies and pH1:1 and pH1:5 ratios. In addition, combined Vis-NIR and pXRF spectra had no improvement in prediction accuracy. Finally, it can be concluded that the prediction accuracy is affected by soil to water ratios and sampling strategies. Individual Vis-NIR spectra can reach the highest prediction accuracy for EC and pH compared to combined pXRF and Vis-NIR spectra.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [121O051]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under grant number 121O051.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compag.2022.107459
dc.identifier.issn0168-1699
dc.identifier.issn1872-7107
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141517224
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107459
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38713
dc.identifier.volume203en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000900077300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofComputers and Electronics in Agricultureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlfisolen_US
dc.subjectDigital Soil Mappingen_US
dc.subjectMachine Learning Algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectSoil Spectraen_US
dc.titleAssessing the Effect of Soil to Water Ratios and Sampling Strategies on the Prediction of EC and pH Using pXRF and Vis-NIR Spectraen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files