Publication:
Predictive Values of Systemic Inflammation Biomarkers in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Associated with Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Background This study evaluates the predictive values of the systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with primary RRD with and without PVR. Methods A total of 150 patients with RRD and 51 age- and sex-matched healthy participants were included in the study. Patients who developed PVR within three months after surgery were enrolled as PVR cases (n = 75, Group 1), and those who did not develop PVR were enrolled in RRD without the PVR group (n = 75, Group 2). Ocular examination findings and medical records of all participants were analysed retrospectively. Peripheral blood samples were collected, and systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios were calculated. The systemic immune-inflammation index calculation formula is: (Neutrophil/lymphocyte) x Platelet. Results The median neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index levels were significantly higher in Group 1 patients compared to Group 2 and the control groups (p = 0.01, for both). However, the groups were similar regarding median platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.917). The optimal cut-off values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index were calculated as 1.72 (with 72% sensitivity and 48% specificity) and 407.9 (with 72% sensitivity and 49.3% specificity), respectively, for predicting PVR development in patients with RRD. Conclusion Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index may be useful biomarkers for predicting the risk of PVR development in RRD patients.

Description

Yeter, Volkan/0000-0002-0357-9009; Kocak, Nurullah/0000-0001-8811-7294

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q2

Source

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volume

106

Issue

8

Start Page

852

End Page

858

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By