Publication:
Comparative Retrospective Analysis of Magnetic Field Therapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Pain Management for Heel Spur

dc.authorscopusid57214776384
dc.authorscopusid57221923663
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Kamil/Agr-2959-2022
dc.contributor.authorSert, Ozlem Akkoyun
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorIDYilmaz, Kamil/0000-0002-5242-3094
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:12:30Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sert, Ozlem Akkoyun] KTO Karatay Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Alaaddin Kap Caddesi Akabe Mah 130, Karatay, Konya, Turkiye; [Yilmaz, Kamil] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Orthot & Prosthet, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionYilmaz, Kamil/0000-0002-5242-3094;en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Heel spurs, caused by inflammation and overstretching of the plantar fascia, are a common source of heel pain. Although various conservative and invasive treatments are used, evidence on their effectiveness remains limited. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and magnetic field application on pain levels in heel spur patients. Methods: The files of 80 patients diagnosed with heel spurs were accessed. Patients with missing demographic information in the files, incomplete Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values, and patients with heel pain complaints for less than 5 months were excluded from the study. A total of 39 patients who met the study criteria were included in the study. While ESWT was applied to 21 of these patients (ESWT group), magnetic field was applied to 18 patients (MA group). All patients were given plantar fascia stretching exercises as a home program. Pain scores before and after treatment were evaluated with VAS. Results: A significant decrease was found in VAS values after the 5th session and 2 months later in both the ESWT group and the magnetic field group (p < 0.001). On the other hand, neither treatment method was found to be superior to each other (p > 0.05). Conclusion: It was observed that the pain of the patients decreased in both the early and late periods in both applications.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10538127241296347
dc.identifier.endpage191en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.issn1878-6324
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39970457
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85219085445
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage184en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241296347
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42020
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001458477100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Painen_US
dc.subjectPlantar Fasciitisen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen_US
dc.titleComparative Retrospective Analysis of Magnetic Field Therapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Pain Management for Heel Spuren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files