Publication: The Comparison of Two Incidental Learning Scenarios on a Digital Learning Platform From the Cognitive Load Perspective
| dc.authorscopusid | 58650424500 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 41961558200 | |
| dc.authorwosid | Sendurur, Emine/Hpc-2887-2023 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bayrambas, Fatma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sendurur, Emine | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-11T00:40:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Bayrambas, Fatma; Sendurur, Emine] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Comp Ed, Kurupelit Kampusu, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiye; [Bayrambas, Fatma; Sendurur, Emine] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Inst Tech, Kurupelit Kampusu, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiye; [Bayrambas, Fatma] Ankara Sci Univ, Dept Comp Technol, Cankaya, Ankara, Turkiye | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Incidental learning is a type of informal learning occurring consciously with unintentional acts. Within the scope of this study, informal learning on a digital learning platform was examined in the context of cognitive load. The current study investigated the changes in incidental learning within two different scenarios: extraneous irrelevant content (V1) vs. extraneous relevant content (V2) represented in various modalities. Data were collected in a mixed manner using eye-tracker and electroencephalogram devices. Both incidental and actual learning scores of V2 group were higher than the V1 group. For the incidental learning context, visual modality was superior to other modalities, but the dynamic visuals were perceived as disturbing in comparison to static ones. The V1 group had higher number of errors during task engagement. The eye fixation patterns of both groups were similar to each other. Fixation durations on the dynamic visual extraneous content area were recorded the longest among all extraneous content. The V2 group reported higher mental effort. The efficiency metric calculations yielded contradictory findings depending on the cognitive load values obtained from self-ratings vs. cognitive load index (CLI). | en_US |
| dc.description.woscitationindex | Social Science Citation Index | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10639-023-12241-2 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 11117 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1360-2357 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-7608 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85174267736 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 11087 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12241-2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38378 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001166265400003 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Education and Information Technologies | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Digital Learning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Informal Learning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Incidental Learning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Modality Effect | en_US |
| dc.subject | Informal Education | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cognitive Load | en_US |
| dc.title | The Comparison of Two Incidental Learning Scenarios on a Digital Learning Platform From the Cognitive Load Perspective | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
