Publication:
The Comparison of Two Incidental Learning Scenarios on a Digital Learning Platform From the Cognitive Load Perspective

dc.authorscopusid58650424500
dc.authorscopusid41961558200
dc.authorwosidSendurur, Emine/Hpc-2887-2023
dc.contributor.authorBayrambas, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorSendurur, Emine
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:40:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bayrambas, Fatma; Sendurur, Emine] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Comp Ed, Kurupelit Kampusu, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiye; [Bayrambas, Fatma; Sendurur, Emine] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Inst Tech, Kurupelit Kampusu, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiye; [Bayrambas, Fatma] Ankara Sci Univ, Dept Comp Technol, Cankaya, Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractIncidental learning is a type of informal learning occurring consciously with unintentional acts. Within the scope of this study, informal learning on a digital learning platform was examined in the context of cognitive load. The current study investigated the changes in incidental learning within two different scenarios: extraneous irrelevant content (V1) vs. extraneous relevant content (V2) represented in various modalities. Data were collected in a mixed manner using eye-tracker and electroencephalogram devices. Both incidental and actual learning scores of V2 group were higher than the V1 group. For the incidental learning context, visual modality was superior to other modalities, but the dynamic visuals were perceived as disturbing in comparison to static ones. The V1 group had higher number of errors during task engagement. The eye fixation patterns of both groups were similar to each other. Fixation durations on the dynamic visual extraneous content area were recorded the longest among all extraneous content. The V2 group reported higher mental effort. The efficiency metric calculations yielded contradictory findings depending on the cognitive load values obtained from self-ratings vs. cognitive load index (CLI).en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10639-023-12241-2
dc.identifier.endpage11117en_US
dc.identifier.issn1360-2357
dc.identifier.issn1573-7608
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174267736
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage11087en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12241-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38378
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001166265400003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEducation and Information Technologiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDigital Learningen_US
dc.subjectInformal Learningen_US
dc.subjectIncidental Learningen_US
dc.subjectModality Effecten_US
dc.subjectInformal Educationen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Loaden_US
dc.titleThe Comparison of Two Incidental Learning Scenarios on a Digital Learning Platform From the Cognitive Load Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files