Publication: Pediatrik Endoskopi Ünitesinde Premedikasyon Tercihlerinin Anestezik Ajan Tüketimi ve Ajitasyon Skorlarına Etkisi
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Abstract
Amaç: Hastaların aynı gün taburcu edildiği pediatrik endoskopi gibi girişimlerde hasta güvenliği ancak iyi anestezi yönetimi ile sağlanır. Anestezi öncesi efektif bir anksiyolitik ile premedikasyon uygulanması, işlem süresince ve derlenme döneminde yaşanabilecek komplikasyon riskini azaltır. Bu çalışmada, premedikasyon amacıyla sık uygulanan midazolam ve deksmedetomidinin; hemodinami, sedasyon skorları, anestezik ajan tüketimi, derlenme - ajitasyon skorları ve uygulayıcı memnuniyetleri üzerine etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Çalışmamız Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu'nun 26.11.2020 tarihli B.30.2.ODM.0.20.08/748 sayılı onayı ile gerçekleştirildi. Tek merkezli, retrospektif çalışmamıza anestezi kayıtları incelenerek 5-15 yaş arası 70 hasta dahil edildi. İşlemden önce premedikasyon amacıyla 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam verilen hastalar Grup M, premedikasyon amacıyla 1 μg/kg intranazal deksmedetomidin verilen hastalar Grup D olarak adlandırıldı. Hastaların demografik verileri, işlem süresi boyunca vital bulguları, Ramsay sedasyon skorları, uygulanan ek propofol miktarı, işlem sonrası Steward derlenme skorları, Emerge ajitasyon skorları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda Grup D'de 5. ve 25. Dakikalardaki kalp hızı daha düşüktü. Diğer zamanlarda kalp hızı ve solunum sayıları açısından gruplar arasında fark yoktu. Grup M'de ek propofol ihtiyacı daha yüksekti (p<0.05). Grup D'de işlem öncesi, 3 ve 10. dk sedasyon skorları daha yüksek seyretti (p<0.05). Emerge ajitasyon skorları Grup M'de daha yüksekti (p<0.05). İşlem sonrası derlenme skorları Grup D'de daha yüksek bulundu. (p<0.05). Uygulayıcı memnuniyetleri açısından iki grup arasında fark yoktu. Sonuç: Deksmedetomidin; pediatrik GİS endoskopisinde premedikasyon amacıyla kullanılan ajanlara iyi bir alternatif olabilir. Ancak sonuçlarımızın iyi planlanmış prospektif çalışmalarla desteklenmesi gerektiği kanaatindeyiz. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ameliyathane dışı anestezi uygulamaları, deksmedetomidin, derlenme ajitasyonu, midazolam, premedikasyon
Background: In procedures such as pediatric endoscopy, where patients are discharged on the same day, patient safety can only be provided with good anesthetic management. Premedication with an effective anxiolytic before anesthesia reduces the risk of complications during the procedure and during the recovery period. In this study, midazolam and dexmedetomidine, which are frequently used for premedication; We aimed to investigate the effects on hemodynamics, sedation scores, anesthetic agent consumption, recovery and agitation scores, and operator satisfaction. Patients and Methods: Our study was carried out with the approval of Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs University Clinical Research Ethics Committee, dated 26.11.2020, numbered B.30.2.ODM.0.20.08 /748. In our single center, retrospective study, 70 patients between the ages of 5 and 15 years were included by examining anesthesia records. The patients who were given 0.5 mg / kg oral midazolam for premedication before the procedure were named Group M, and the patients who were given 1 μg / kg intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication were named as Group D. Demographic data of the patients, vital signs during the procedure, Ramsay sedation scores, the amount of additional propofol applied, Steward recovery scores after the procedure, Emerge agitation scores were recorded. Results: In our study, the heart rate at the 5th and 25th minutes was lower in Group D. At other times, there was no difference between the groups in terms of heart rate and respiratory rates. Additional propofol need was higher in Group M (p <0.05). In Group D, sedation scores before the procedure, at the 3rd and 10th minutes were higher (p <0.05). Emerge agitation scores were higher in Group M (p <0.05). Post-procedure recovery scores were higher in Group D. (p <0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of practitioner satisfaction. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine can be a good alternative to agents used for premedication in pediatric GIS endoscopy. However, we are of the opinion that our results should be supported by well-planned prospective studies. Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Emerge agitation, midazolam, non-operating room anesthesia, premedication
Background: In procedures such as pediatric endoscopy, where patients are discharged on the same day, patient safety can only be provided with good anesthetic management. Premedication with an effective anxiolytic before anesthesia reduces the risk of complications during the procedure and during the recovery period. In this study, midazolam and dexmedetomidine, which are frequently used for premedication; We aimed to investigate the effects on hemodynamics, sedation scores, anesthetic agent consumption, recovery and agitation scores, and operator satisfaction. Patients and Methods: Our study was carried out with the approval of Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs University Clinical Research Ethics Committee, dated 26.11.2020, numbered B.30.2.ODM.0.20.08 /748. In our single center, retrospective study, 70 patients between the ages of 5 and 15 years were included by examining anesthesia records. The patients who were given 0.5 mg / kg oral midazolam for premedication before the procedure were named Group M, and the patients who were given 1 μg / kg intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication were named as Group D. Demographic data of the patients, vital signs during the procedure, Ramsay sedation scores, the amount of additional propofol applied, Steward recovery scores after the procedure, Emerge agitation scores were recorded. Results: In our study, the heart rate at the 5th and 25th minutes was lower in Group D. At other times, there was no difference between the groups in terms of heart rate and respiratory rates. Additional propofol need was higher in Group M (p <0.05). In Group D, sedation scores before the procedure, at the 3rd and 10th minutes were higher (p <0.05). Emerge agitation scores were higher in Group M (p <0.05). Post-procedure recovery scores were higher in Group D. (p <0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of practitioner satisfaction. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine can be a good alternative to agents used for premedication in pediatric GIS endoscopy. However, we are of the opinion that our results should be supported by well-planned prospective studies. Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Emerge agitation, midazolam, non-operating room anesthesia, premedication
Description
Tam Metin / Tez
Citation
Büyükceran, B. (2021). Pediatrik endoskopi ünitesinde premedikasyon tercihlerinin anestezik ajan tüketimi ve ajitasyon skorlarına etkisi. (Tıpta uzmanlık tezi). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun.
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Source
Volume
Issue
Start Page
End Page
81
