Publication:
Biomechanical Comparison of Plating Techniques for Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle

dc.authorscopusid7006266302
dc.authorscopusid6602091313
dc.authorscopusid23470335700
dc.authorscopusid56261590400
dc.authorscopusid56248493700
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, A.
dc.contributor.authorMetin, M.
dc.contributor.authorMug̈lali, M.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, B.
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:23:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:23:50Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Alkan] Alper, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Metin] Murat, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Mug̈lali] Mehtap, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özden] Bora, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çelebi] Nükhet, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractWe compared the biomechanical behaviour of various rigid internal fixation techniques for treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Fifteen sheep hemimandibles were used to evaluate three bicortical plating techniques. A custom-made 3-point biomechanical test model was used for the samples. Each group was tested with compression forces by an Instron Lloyd LRX machine. The resistance to forces (N) that caused displacements of 1.75 and 3.50 mm were compared using the Instron software programme and displacement graphics. There were no significant differences among the three groups for displacements of 1.75 and 3.50 mm. Our study showed that the titanium miniadaptation plates, minicompression plates, and the absorbable miniplates did not differ significantly in their biomechanical behaviour. © 2006 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.04.011
dc.identifier.endpage149en_US
dc.identifier.issn0266-4356
dc.identifier.issn1532-1940
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16777278
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33846380315
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage145en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.04.011
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000244579500009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalBritish Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicalen_US
dc.subjectCondyle Fractureen_US
dc.subjectMiniplateen_US
dc.subjectRigid Fixationen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical Comparison of Plating Techniques for Fractures of the Mandibular Condyleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files