Publication:
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale

dc.authorscopusid57217259126
dc.authorscopusid59498720700
dc.authorscopusid57210580053
dc.authorscopusid57191925575
dc.authorscopusid6602582358
dc.authorwosidGencersendur, Elif/Lze-7570-2025
dc.authorwosidBilgehan, Tuğba/Kwu-3827-2024
dc.authorwosidCanbolat, Ozlem/Ahi-1046-2022
dc.contributor.authorBilgehan, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorSendur, Elif Gencer
dc.contributor.authorCanbolat, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorDünder, Emre
dc.contributor.authorPolonsky, William H.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bilgehan, Tugba] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Ankara, Turkiye; [Sendur, Elif Gencer] Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Bolu, Turkiye; [Canbolat, Ozlem] Gazi Univ, Fac Nursing, Ankara, Turkiye; [Dunder, Emre] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Stat, Samsun, Turkiye; [Polonsky, William H.] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med, San Diego, CA USAen_US
dc.description.abstractAims: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale Methods: This methodological, descriptive, and correlational study was conducted with 292 individuals diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. Data were collected between January 2024 and August 2024 using the "Information Form for Individuals with Diabetes," the "Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale," and the "Patient Health Questionnaire." The linguistic validity and content validity of the scale were evaluated, with content validity assessed using the Davis technique. The psychometric properties of the scale were analyzed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and parallel-form reliability. Results: The Turkish version of the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale consists of 21 items and two subdimensions (Factor 1: Concerns About Diabetes Management; Factor 2: Social Diabetes Perception and Pressure). The twofactor structure explained 66 % of the total variance. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.96. Test-retest reliability analysis revealed a high, positive, and statistically significant correlation (r = 0.995, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The questionnaire was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating diabetes distress in patients with type 1 diabetes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipthe work reported in this paper.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.001
dc.identifier.endpage389en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-9918
dc.identifier.issn1878-0210
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid40328632
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004369276
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/39103
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001568428200004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofPrimary Care Diabetesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiabetes Distressen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectType 1 Diabetesen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleValidity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scaleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files