Publication:
Yazdgird I, Saint Marutha and the Changing Images of the Sassanid King

dc.authorscopusid58967157400
dc.contributor.authorTural, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:32:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Tural, Murat] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Carsamba Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Hist, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study analyses the relations that established Yazdgird I (Yazdekert, 399-420) in the context of faith with the Eastern Roman Empire and the Christians living in the Sassanid Iran. The article first examines the records found in the sources relating to the Roman emperor Arcadius entrusting the protection of his infant son Theodosios II to Yazdgird I. Afterwards, the role of Marutha, the bishop of Maiperkat, in the friendly relations between the two sides was analysed, and the importance of the Synod of M & amacr;r Ishaq (410), which was a significant step towards the institutionalisation of the East Syriac Church in the Iranian geography, was emphasised. Yazdgird I, who contributed to the foundation of Martyropolis together with Theodosios II, turned towards some anti-Christian movements, indicating that he faced some problems in the internal policy. If the Persian Martyr Narratives (Persian Martyr Acts) are to be trusted, Yazdgird I, who pursued pragmatic policies during his reign, resorted to punishing Christians, especially those who went too far in their anti-Zoroastrianism as a result of the incitements of the Zoroastrian priests and nobles. It has been debated for the last two decades whether the Persian Martyr Narratives can provide a contemporary witness to the situation of Christians living in the Sassanid Dynasty. In this article, this last type of source, which has a predominantly religious and literary character, is used together with the records of the church historian Theodoretus to illuminate the years of Yazdgird I's reign. On the other hand, Yazdgird I is almost without exception referred to as a "sinner" in the Arab-Iranian historiography. This unity of opinion makes it difficult to accept Yazdgird I as a king who persecuted Christians, despite the aforementioned records.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexArts & Humanities Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.37879/belleten.2024.697
dc.identifier.issn0041-4255
dc.identifier.issue313en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213478655
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2024.697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/37291
dc.identifier.volume88en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001388524100002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.institutionauthorTural, Murat
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTürk Tarih Kurumuen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBelletenen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectYazdgird Ien_US
dc.subjectSaint Maruthaen_US
dc.subjectSassanidsen_US
dc.subjectEastern Romanen_US
dc.subjectPersecutionen_US
dc.titleYazdgird I, Saint Marutha and the Changing Images of the Sassanid Kingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files