Publication:
Assessment of the Medical Reliability of Videos on Social Media: Detailed Analysis of the Quality and Usability of Four Social Media Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube)

dc.authorscopusid53981294400
dc.authorscopusid56241636900
dc.authorwosidBuyukceran, Ismail/Lzf-5212-2025
dc.authorwosidGürler, Deniz/O-9444-2014
dc.contributor.authorGurler, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorBuyukceran, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:43:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gurler, Deniz] Univ Hlth Sci, Samsun Training & Res Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, TR-55090 Samsun, Turkey; [Buyukceran, Ismail] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In recent years, the internet and social media have become the primary source for patients to research their medical conditions. Given the billions of links that result from research, it has become increasingly important how medically high quality the priorities of the search algorithms are. This study aims to examine the medical quality of videos on social media. Material and Method: A new Gmail account was never used, and Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube accounts were opened. The word "knee replacement" was searched via social media. The video duration, daily views, total views, number of likes, source, and shared content were recorded. The parameters were statistically evaluated using the scales JAMA, GQS, DISCERN, and VPI to measure the quality of the medical posts. Results: Correlations were found between JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN. No correlation between the VPI scales with other scales was found. It was found that the promotional content in videos other than Instagram was very high (56-70%). Academics and healthcare workers produced greater quality content than other groups. There is a clear dominance of healthcare practitioners on Instagram. The most shared content was informative, depending on the content. The most frequent users were alternative health practitioners. While YouTube had the highest JAMA, GQC, and DISCERN (2.98, 3.18, 37.5) scores, the lowest VPI (0.761) score was found. Discussion and Conclusions: It has been shown that Instagram and Twitter are not the right places to share videos with medical content. However, everyone should remember that Instagram is the best place to share short but popular videos. YouTube and Facebook are available resources to share videos of better medical quality with a higher score than others. We can say that the most reliable medical sources are Facebook and YouTube videos of physicians and medical staff.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare10101836
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36292284
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140631618
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101836
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38781
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000873321600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcareen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSocial Mediaen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.subjectInstagramen_US
dc.subjectTwitteren_US
dc.subjectFacebooken_US
dc.subjectVideoen_US
dc.subjectKnee Replacementen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the Medical Reliability of Videos on Social Media: Detailed Analysis of the Quality and Usability of Four Social Media Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files