Publication:
Wingate Anaerobic Testing with a Modified Electromagnetically Braked Elliptical Trainer. Part II: Physiological Considerations

dc.authorscopusid28767936600
dc.authorscopusid10340647500
dc.authorscopusid28767642200
dc.authorscopusid28767792100
dc.authorscopusid36923765500
dc.authorwosidOzkaya, Ozgur/Gpx-6189-2022
dc.authorwosidKuzucu, Once Erinc/Jbj-6322-2023
dc.authorwosidColakoglu, Muzaffer/C-1669-2009
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Muzaffer
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorKuzucu, O. Erinc
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Sule
dc.contributor.authorIDOzkaya, Ozgur/0000-0003-4222-5761
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:07:11Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Colakoglu, Muzaffer; Fowler, Dianne] Ege Univ, Sch Phys Educ & Sports, Coaching Educ Dept, Izmir, Turkey; [Ozkaya, Ozgur; Kuzucu, O. Erinc] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Phys Educ & Sports, Coaching Educ Dept, Samsun, Turkey; [Colakoglu, Sule] Celal Bayar Univ, Sch Phys Educ & Sports, Coaching Educ Dept, Manisa, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionOzkaya, Ozgur/0000-0003-4222-5761en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Wingate Anaerobic Test is the most common method used to evaluate explosive power and anaerobic capacity. The Wingate Anaerobic Test performed on an elliptical trainer (WAnTet) may be more accurate than the Wingate Anaerobic Test performed on a cycle ergometer (WAnTc) since larger muscle group recruitment with the WAnTet results in higher anaerobic output. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare peak power ( PP), average power (AP), fatigue index (FI%) and delta lactate responses (Delta La) between WAnTet and WAnTc in healthy male university athletes. In our test subjects, (n = 40; 21 +/- 2 years old), PP ( 1463 +/- 238 vs. 879 +/- 162 watts) and AP ( 1127 +/- 191 vs. 649 +/- 82 watts) for the WAnTet were higher when compared to the WAnTc ( p < 0.001). FI%s of WAnTet and WAnTc were similar ( 49.8 +/- 10.3% and 46.9 +/- 8.3%, respectively; p = 0.054) but. La values were higher for WAnTet than for WAnTc (12.9 +/- 1.7 mM vs. 9.2 +/- 1.5 mM, respectively; p < 0.001). Using an elliptical trainer, rather than a traditional cycle ergometer, results in a more accurate measure of anaerobic power when Wingate Anaerobic Testing is performed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcibadem Health Group, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to give special thanks to the Acibadem Health Group for the material support they provided. The authors also would like to thank Cem Seref Bediz for his editorial assistance. This study was sponsored by the Acibadem Health Group, Istanbul, Turkey.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/IES-2009-0342
dc.identifier.endpage119en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-3020
dc.identifier.issn1878-5913
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-67651222585
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/IES-2009-0342
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41408
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000267950800010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIsokinetics and Exercise Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectWingate Anaerobic Testen_US
dc.subjectElliptical Traineren_US
dc.subjectCycle Ergometeren_US
dc.titleWingate Anaerobic Testing with a Modified Electromagnetically Braked Elliptical Trainer. Part II: Physiological Considerationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files