Publication:
Finite Element Evaluation of Different Osteosynthesis Variations That Used After Segmental Mandibular Resection

dc.authorscopusid54394104700
dc.authorscopusid56261590400
dc.authorscopusid20733782300
dc.contributor.authorŞanal, K.O.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, B.
dc.contributor.authorBaş, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:28:06Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:28:06Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şanal] Koray Onur, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı,, Ankara, Turkey; [Özden] Bora, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Baş] Burcu, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different reconstruction plates and screw combinations on stress distribution of segmental resected mandibles using finite element analysis. Methods: Lateral (L) and lateral-central (LC) defects were simulated by a computer aided design modeling. The straight (s) and angular (a) titanium locking reconstruction plates of 2.5mm(12 holes for L defects and 16 holes for LC defects) were modeled. Each screw was 2.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length. A total of 20 different screw placement combinations were created. The bite force used in the present model was a unilateral molar clench. The data obtained from finite element analysis were recorded as von Mises, maximum principle and minimum principle stress values. Results: It was observed that stress values on neck of screw were higher for screws close to the resection area. When the first screw was loosened, the stress on the plate body and the remaining screws increased. Principle stress values were within the tolerance limits of the bone. Conclusion: The highest stress is observed in the screws nearest to the resection edge. Therefore, it is very important to place a screw adjacent to the resection edge.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000003205
dc.identifier.endpage65en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27893561
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84997706195
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage61en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003205
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000392299200015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins kathiest.clai@apta.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysisen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectOsteosynthesisen_US
dc.titleFinite Element Evaluation of Different Osteosynthesis Variations That Used After Segmental Mandibular Resectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files