Publication:
A Comparison of Injection Pain with Articaine with Adrenaline, Prilocaine with Phenylpressin and Lidocaine with Adrenaline

dc.authorscopusid55909449700
dc.authorscopusid35311493500
dc.authorscopusid56248493700
dc.authorscopusid23470335700
dc.contributor.authorSümer, M.
dc.contributor.authorMısır, F.
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, N.
dc.contributor.authorMug̈lali, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:13:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:13:32Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sümer] Mahmut, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Mısır] Ahmet Ferhat, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çelebi] Nükhet, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Mug̈lali] Mehtap, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of the present study was to investigate the pain on injection of articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin, and lidocaine with adrenaline. Study Design: The study sample was comprised of 497 consecutively seen patients received 497 maxillary buccal infiltration injections or inferior alveolar block injections of 4% articaine with 1:200.000 adrenaline, 3% prilocaine with 1.08mcg phenylpressin, or 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 adrenaline. Immediately after the injection, patients were asked to rate their injection pain on a six-point scale. Results: There were no significant differences among the anesthetic solutions for injection pain. Patients usually reported mild or no injection pain for all of anesthetic administrations. Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study that lidocaine with adrenaline, articaine with adrenaline and prilocaine with phenylpressin seemed to be similar for pain on injection and they could be quite painless. © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F.en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE430en_US
dc.identifier.issn1698-4447
dc.identifier.issn1698-6946
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18587306
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-52249094004
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpageE427en_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000259667200006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedicina Oral S Len_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucalen_US
dc.relation.journalMedicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArticaineen_US
dc.subjectInferior Alveolar Block Injectionen_US
dc.subjectInjection Painen_US
dc.subjectLidocaineen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary Local Anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectPrilocaineen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Injection Pain with Articaine with Adrenaline, Prilocaine with Phenylpressin and Lidocaine with Adrenalineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files