Publication:
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Multi-Span Steel Truss Railway Bridges in Turkey

dc.authorscopusid57224684510
dc.authorscopusid6505666430
dc.authorscopusid23487737000
dc.authorwosidCaglayan, Barlas/E-6564-2013
dc.authorwosidOzakgul, Kadir/Aaa-6764-2021
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Mehmet Fatih/Aaa-5291-2022
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Mehmet F.
dc.contributor.authorOzakgul, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorCaglayan, Barlas O.
dc.contributor.authorIDYilmaz, Mehmet Fatih/0000-0002-2746-7589
dc.contributor.authorIDCaglayan, Barlas Ozden/0000-0002-8986-9188
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:14:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yilmaz, Mehmet F.] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey; [Ozakgul, Kadir; Caglayan, Barlas O.] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionYilmaz, Mehmet Fatih/0000-0002-2746-7589; Caglayan, Barlas Ozden/0000-0002-8986-9188;en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, seismic fragility analysis of multi-span steel truss bridges still giving service in railway network of Turkey was aimed. For this purpose, two representative multi-span steel truss bridges were selected in Turkish railway lines. A detailed three-dimensional inelastic finite element (FE) model for each bridge was created using commercial FE software. These models were used to perform non-linear time history analyses for each of the selected 30 ground motions scaled to 10 different peak ground acceleration (PGA) values to assess seismic demands of the bridges. To develop fragility curves, probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs) were defined. The most appropriate ground motion intensity measure (IM) for PSDMs of both bridges was determined among 11 IMs and the PGA was found as the optimal IM. Finally, the fragility curves for both the components and structural systems of the bridges were developed. The results clearly showed that the multi-span continuous (MSC) steel truss bridge is more vulnerable than the multi-span simply supported (MSSS) steel truss bridge, and for both bridge types, steel bearings are the most vulnerable components. Additionally, top wind braces for the MSC bridge as well as transverse beams and truss vertical members for the MSSS bridge were found as the most vulnerable superstructure members.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [114M332]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe presented research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) having Project No. 114M332.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15732479.2021.1951774
dc.identifier.endpage437en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2479
dc.identifier.issn1744-8980
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85111644287
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1951774
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42339
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000675736200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofStructure and Infrastructure Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSteel Railway Bridgeen_US
dc.subjectSteel Bearingen_US
dc.subjectFragility Analysisen_US
dc.subjectIntensity Measureen_US
dc.subjectEngineering Demand Parameteren_US
dc.subjectNon-Linear Time History Analysisen_US
dc.subjectProbabilistic Seismic Demand Modelen_US
dc.titleSeismic Fragility Analysis of Multi-Span Steel Truss Railway Bridges in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files