Publication:
Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia of the Breast

dc.authorscopusid57188753630
dc.authorscopusid22945639700
dc.authorwosidSullu, Yurdanur/Agl-4996-2022
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Dilek/Kyp-9290-2024
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorSullu, Yurdanur
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:27:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:27:47Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yilmaz, Dilek] SB Corum Devlet Hastahanesi, Patol Bolumu, Corum, Turkey; [Sullu, Yurdanur] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Patol Anabilim Dali, Samsun, Turkey; [Yilmaz, Dilek] MH Corum State Hosp, Dept Pathol, Corum, Turkey; [Sullu, Yurdanur] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast is a benign stromal lesion that can be mistaken as fibroadenoma on clinical and ultrasonographic examination or as a low grade angiosarcoma on histological examination. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia may be seen incidentally in about 23% of breast biopsies. Although exact etiology and pathogenesis of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia is still unknown, reactivity of myofibroblasts against endogeneous hormones particularly progesterone is thought to be responsible. Because mass forming lesions are rare we present a case of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia which was diagnosed as fibroadenoma on clinical and ultrasonographic examination. A 27year-old woman presented with a right breast mass. After physical and ultrasonographic examination, it was diagnosed as fibroadenoma and excision was done. Histopathological examination revealed a lesion composed of complex anastomosing vessel-like slits in a dense collageneous stroma. These slits were outlined by endothelial-like spindle cells. These spindle cells were negative for CD31 while CD34 and SMA were positive. Reactivity with CD34 and SMA showed myofibroblastic differantiation of spindle cells. Although unclear, aberrant reactivity of myofibroblasts against progesterone is suggested in pathogenesis of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. Unlike the previous reported cases, the negativity of myofibroblastic cells for progesterone in our case suggest other factors aside from progesterone may play role in the etiology.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.5146/tjpath.2010.01021
dc.identifier.endpage269en_US
dc.identifier.issn1018-5615
dc.identifier.issn1309-5730
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957296429
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage267en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2010.01021
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000217434700018
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherFederation Turkish Pathology Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Pathologyen_US
dc.relation.journalTurk Patoloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Pathologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBreasten_US
dc.subjectPseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasiaen_US
dc.titlePseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia of the Breasten_US
dc.title.alternativeMemenin Psödoanjiyomatöz Stromal Hiperplazisien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files