Publication:
Efficacy and Safety of Topical Cyclosporine A 0.05% in Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

dc.authorscopusid54401920900
dc.authorscopusid57192070570
dc.contributor.authorYücel, O.E.
dc.contributor.authorUlus, N.D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yücel] Özlem Eşki, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ulus] Nihal Demir, Department of Ophthalmology, Eskisehir State Hospital, Eskisehir, Eskisehir, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION While corticosteroids are an effective choice of treatment for severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC),their long-term use is restricted due to side effects. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% in the treatment of VKC. METHODS A total of 30 patients with VKC that was resistant to topical corticosteroids,antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers were treated with topical CsA 0.05%. Patients were evaluated at Weeks 4,8 and 12 after the initiation of therapy. Symptoms and signs observed before and after treatment were recorded and scores were assigned. Scores for symptoms and signs,the need for topical corticosteroids and ocular side effects were evaluated. RESULTS At baseline,the median values of the symptom and sign scores were 10.0 (range 5.0–18.0) and 6.0 (range 2.0–13.0),respectively. At Week 4 of treatment with topical CsA 0.05%,the median values of the symptom and sign scores were 3.0 (range 0–14.0) and 3.0 (range 0–8.0),respectively. The reductions in the symptom and sign scores were statistically significant. The reduction in the need for corticosteroid was statistically significant by Week 12 of therapy. No significant side effects were reported. CONCLUSION Topical CsA 0.05%,which can help to reduce corticosteroid usage,is an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of resistant VKC. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy and possibility of recurrence. © 2016,Singapore Medical Association. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.11622/smedj.2015161
dc.identifier.endpage510en_US
dc.identifier.issn0037-5675
dc.identifier.issn2737-5935
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26768065
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84996520850
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage507en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2015161
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000384978500007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSingapore Medical Association 2 College Road, Level 2 Singapore 169850en_US
dc.relation.ispartofSingapore Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalSingapore Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAllergic Conjunctivitisen_US
dc.subjectCyclosporine Aen_US
dc.subjectRestasisen_US
dc.subjectVernal Keratoconjunctivitisen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Topical Cyclosporine A 0.05% in Vernal Keratoconjunctivitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files